When was Bihar first separated from the Bengal Presidency under the British-ruled India?
- (a)1912
- (b)1936
- (c)1947
- (d)None of the above
Correct — A, 1912. King-Emperor George V announced the change in person at the Delhi Durbar on 12 December 1911, promising 'the creation at as early a date as possible of a Governorship for the Presidency of Bengal, of a new Lieutenant-Governorship in Council administering the areas of Bihar, Chota Nagpur, and Orissa, and of a Chief Commissionership of Assam'. The announcement was then executed on a single day. Courtenay Ilbert, who as Law Member had drafted much of this statute book and who wrote the standard digest of it, records that three proclamations were notified together on 22 March 1912: the first carved 'a new province... out of the previous lieutenant-governorship of Bengal, was called Bihar and Orissa, and was placed under a lieutenant-governor'; the second delimited what would remain the Presidency of Fort William in Bengal; the third took Assam back under a chief commissioner. Each rested on a different Victorian section — Bihar and Orissa on section 46 of the Indian Councils Act, 1861, Bengal's new limits on section 47 of that Act together with section 4 of the Government of India Act, 1865, and Assam on section 3 of the Government of India Act, 1854 — and 'the territorial redistributions made by the proclamations of March 22 took effect on the following April 1'. Bihar accordingly observes 22 March as Bihar Diwas. The first of those proclamations, No. 289 in the Gazette of India Extraordinary, is worth reading for what it actually contains: it constitutes the Bhagalpur Division (Bhagalpur, Monghyr, Purnea and the Sonthal Parganas), the Patna Division (Gaya, Patna and Shahabad), the Tirhut Division (Champaran, Darbhanga, Muzaffarpur and Saran), the Chota Nagpur Division (Hazaribagh, Manbhum, Palamau, Ranchi and Singhbhum) and the Orissa Division (Angul, Balasore, Cuttack, Puri and Sambalpur) into one province, directs 'that the said Province shall be called the Province of Bihar and Orissa', and appoints Sir Charles Stuart Bayley its first Lieutenant-Governor, with effect from 1 April 1912. The new province ran to roughly 113,000 square miles with about 35 million people and its capital at Patna, while the reconstituted Bengal — under a Governor, Lord Carmichael, appointed by royal warrant the previous day — kept the five Bengali-speaking divisions, some 70,000 square miles and about 42 million people. Three days later, on 25 March 1912, an Act of the Governor-General in Council was pushed through all its stages as a measure of urgency to adapt the old laws and to constitute a board of revenue for Bihar and Orissa. Westminster then tidied up: the Government of India Act, 1912, which received the Royal Assent on 25 June 1912, declared the powers of the new Governor of Bengal and by section 2 authorised an executive council for Bihar and Orissa without the further reference to Parliament that the Indian Councils Act, 1909 would otherwise have required. That council was duly formed of the Maharaja of Darbhanga and two English members.
- (b)1936 — A real separation, but pointing the other way. Section 289 of the Government of India Act, 1935 created two new provinces, Sind and Orissa: Orissa was to be separated from Bihar and Orissa and enlarged with areas taken from the Presidency of Madras and the Central Provinces, and the Act enacted that 'the Province formerly known as Bihar and Orissa shall be known as the Province of Bihar'. Note the change in machinery as well as in direction — where 1912 needed only an executive proclamation under an 1861 section, the 1935 Act required an Order in Council, and its section 290 obliged the Secretary of State to ascertain the views of the legislatures concerned before any future province could be made. The Order took effect on 1 April 1936, the day Odisha keeps as Utkal Divas, and it separated Orissa from Bihar — not Bihar from Bengal.
- (c)1947 — By 1947 Bihar had been a separate province for thirty-five years, with its own Lieutenant-Governor since 1912, its own High Court at Patna and its own legislature. The Indian Independence Act, 1947 partitioned British India into the two Dominions of India and Pakistan and set 15 August 1947 as the appointed day; it detached Bihar from nothing. Bihar simply carried on, becoming a Part A State when the Constitution came into force on 26 January 1950. The year is in the option set because 1947 is the default date a candidate reaches for when a question about British India mentions any boundary at all.
- (d)None of the above — This would require all three listed years to be wrong. One of them is documented to the day: a proclamation notified on 22 March 1912, made under a named enabling section, appointing a named first Lieutenant-Governor, taking effect on a stated date, and recited afterwards in an Act of Parliament that received the Royal Assent on 25 June 1912. A residual option cannot stand against a chain of instruments that specific — and on a 'when was X' stem, 'none of the above' is worth choosing only when you can say what the right year actually is.
Provinces in British India were administrative creations, not constitutional entities, and until 1935 they could be made, unmade and redrawn by executive act under an enabling section of an old statute — no fresh legislation, no consultation, no vote. The Bengal Presidency was the largest of them, an inheritance of the Diwani of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa granted to the East India Company by Shah Alam II in 1765; at its widest it covered Bengal, Bihar, Chota Nagpur, Orissa and Assam under a single Lieutenant-Governor. That officer existed only because a power in section 16 of the Government of India Act, 1853 to appoint a full Governor for Fort William had been left unused: as Ilbert explains, the power 'remained in abeyance' for sixty years and 'was exercised in March 1912 when a governorship was substituted for a lieutenant-governorship of Bengal'. Lord Curzon split the presidency in October 1905 into Bengal and a new Eastern Bengal and Assam, provoking the Swadeshi movement. The 1911 Durbar reversed that split on a different principle: instead of dividing Bengalis it reunited the Bengali-speaking divisions under a Governor in Council and hived off the non-Bengali blocks — Bihar, Chota Nagpur and Orissa into one new province, Assam back to a Chief Commissioner. By 1935 the machinery had changed completely. The Government of India Act, 1935 listed eleven Governors' Provinces, created Sind and Orissa by its own section 289, and in section 290 required any future creation, enlargement, reduction or boundary change to be made by Order in Council after the Secretary of State had taken steps to ascertain the views of the Federal Legislature and of the provincial governments and legislatures affected. The distance between a proclamation in a gazette and a consulted Order in Council is the distance between 1912 and 1936.
The whole question turns on the word 'first'. Two of the four options are genuine separations, and a candidate who has half-learnt the story will remember '1936 — Bihar and Orissa split' and choose (b). The discriminator is direction: 1912 separated Bihar, along with Orissa and Chota Nagpur, from Bengal; 1936 separated Orissa from Bihar. A second and more reliable discriminator is to attach each date to a named instrument, because a date you cannot document is a date you have probably misremembered — 1912 goes with the proclamation of 22 March under section 46 of the Indian Councils Act, 1861, followed by the Government of India Act, 1912; 1936 goes with section 289 of the Government of India Act, 1935; 1947 goes with the Indian Independence Act. A third check, useful when the instrument escapes you, is the state holiday: Bihar Diwas falls on 22 March and Utkal Divas on 1 April, and the two dates belong to two different events twenty-four years apart. Two further precisions are worth holding. The province created in 1912 was not called 'Bihar' — it was 'Bihar and Orissa', it took its present name only in 1936 by the renaming clause of section 289, and it kept Chota Nagpur until the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 created Jharkhand on 15 November 2000. And the announcement is not the event: the Durbar declaration of 12 December 1911 promised the change 'at as early a date as possible', which is the language of intention; the province came into existence only when the proclamation of 22 March took effect on 1 April 1912.
- 12 December 1911 — George V announced at the Delhi Durbar the transfer of the seat of government from Calcutta to Delhi and, 'as a consequence of that transfer', a new Lieutenant-Governorship in Council 'administering the areas of Bihar, Chota Nagpur, and Orissa'
- 22 March 1912 — three proclamations were notified the same day: one creating Bihar and Orissa under section 46 of the Indian Councils Act, 1861, one delimiting the Presidency of Fort William in Bengal under section 47 of that Act and section 4 of the Government of India Act, 1865, and one restoring Assam to a chief commissioner under section 3 of the Government of India Act, 1854
- Proclamation No. 289 constituted five divisions — Bhagalpur, Patna, Tirhut, Chota Nagpur and Orissa — as the Province of Bihar and Orissa and named Sir Charles Stuart Bayley its first Lieutenant-Governor; the redistribution took effect on 1 April 1912, and 22 March is kept as Bihar Diwas
- The 1912 province covered about 113,000 square miles with roughly 35 million people and its capital at Patna; the reconstituted Bengal had about 70,000 square miles and 42 million people under a Governor in Council, Lord Carmichael being appointed by royal warrant of 21 March 1912
- An Act of the Governor-General in Council was passed through all its stages as a measure of urgency on 25 March 1912 to adapt the existing laws to the new provinces and to constitute a board of revenue for Bihar and Orissa
- The Government of India Act, 1912 (Royal Assent 25 June 1912) declared the powers of the new Governor of Bengal and by section 2 authorised an executive council for Bihar and Orissa without the reference to Parliament that the Indian Councils Act, 1909 required; the council was formed of the Maharaja of Darbhanga and two English members
- Section 289 of the Government of India Act, 1935 created the Provinces of Sind and Orissa — Orissa being enlarged with areas from Madras and the Central Provinces — and enacted that 'the Province formerly known as Bihar and Orissa shall be known as the Province of Bihar'; the Order in Council took effect on 1 April 1936
The question asks for the FIRST separation of Bihar from Bengal: that is 1912, option (a). 1936 runs the other way — it separates Orissa from Bihar.
- Picking 1936 because it is a genuine separation — it separated Orissa from Bihar, the reverse of what the stem asks
- Calling the 1912 province 'Bihar' — the proclamation names it 'the Province of Bihar and Orissa', and it also contained the Chota Nagpur Division, today's Jharkhand
- Dating the event to the Durbar announcement of December 1911 rather than to the proclamation of 22 March 1912 and its effect from 1 April 1912
BPSC asks Bihar's own constitutional milestones flat, as a bare year, and expects the candidate to keep 1912, 1936 and 2000 apart — the state's own Bihar Diwas on 22 March makes the first of those a near-compulsory fact, and the same three dates recur as fill-in-the-blank and match-the-following items. UPSC rarely names Bihar here; it comes at the same knowledge through the instrument, asking what the 1905 Partition of Bengal lasted until (2014) or exactly which provisions the Government of India Act, 1935 contained (2004, 2024). Learn each date with its enabling section attached and both styles of question are covered at once.
The Partition of Bengal made by Lord Curzon in 1905 lasted until
- (a) the First World War when Indian leaders decided to support the British and demanded its annulment as a quid pro quo
- (b) King George V abrogated Curzon's Act at the Royal Durbar in Delhi in 1911
- (c) Gandhiji launched his Civil Disobedience Movement
- (d) the Partition of India in 1947
Answer(b) King George V abrogated Curzon's Act at the Royal Durbar in Delhi in 1911
The same event seen from the Bengal side: the 1911 Durbar announcement that annulled Curzon's partition is the very announcement that ordered a new province of Bihar, Chota Nagpur and Orissa, carried into effect by the proclamation of 22 March 1912.
With reference to the Government of India Act, 1935, consider the following statements: 1. It provided for the establishment of an All India Federation based on the union of the British Indian Provinces and Princely States. 2. Defence and Foreign Affairs were kept under the control of the federal legislature. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- (a) 1 only
- (b) 2 only
- (c) Both 1 and 2
- (d) Neither 1 nor 2
Answer(a) 1 only
Tests the contents of the statute that sits behind the 1936 distractor here — it is section 289 of this Act that created Sind and Orissa and renamed the residue 'the Province of Bihar', so knowing what the 1935 Act did is what keeps 1912 and 1936 apart.
- practice — not a real PYQ
The Province of Bihar and Orissa, created in 1912, had its capital at
- (a)Patna
- (b)Ranchi
- (c)Cuttack
- (d)Bhagalpur
Answer(a) Patna — the new Lieutenant-Governorship in Council of Bihar, Chota Nagpur and Orissa was seated at Patna; Ranchi later served as its summer capital and Cuttack became the headquarters of Orissa after 1936.
- practice — not a real PYQ
Under which provision was the separate Province of Orissa carved out of Bihar and Orissa in 1936?
- (a)Section 46 of the Indian Councils Act, 1861
- (b)Section 289 of the Government of India Act, 1935
- (c)The Government of India Act, 1919
- (d)The Indian Independence Act, 1947
Answer(b) Section 289 of the Government of India Act, 1935 — it created the Provinces of Sind and Orissa and renamed the remainder 'the Province of Bihar'; section 46 of the 1861 Act was the power used in 1912.