In an election of 3 candidates A, B and C, A gets 50% more votes than B. A also beats C by 18,000 votes. If it is known that B gets 5% more votes than C, then find the number of voters on the voting list, given that 90% of the voters on the voting list voted and no votes were illegal.
- (1)1,00,000
- (2)81,000
- (3)90,000
- (4)1,10,000
Answer
Why
RPSC deleted this question in its final answer key, so no option is marked correct.
The stem links three candidates' votes by percentages and a margin, then asks for the number of voters on the voting list. The method: write every count in terms of one unknown, use the margin to find it, add the votes, and scale up for turnout.
Step 1 — write the votes in terms of C's votes, c.
"B gets 5% more votes than C": B = 1.05c
"A gets 50% more votes than B": A = 1.5 × 1.05c = 1.575c
Step 2 — use the margin.
"A also beats C by 18,000 votes": A − C = 0.575c = 18,000
c = 18,000 ÷ 0.575 ≈ 31,304.3
Step 3 — total votes polled.
No votes were illegal, so votes polled = A + B + C
= 1.575c + 1.05c + c = 3.625c ≈ 1,13,478
Step 4 — scale up for turnout.
90% of the voters on the list voted, so list = votes polled ÷ 0.9.
The idea to remember: percentage increases in a chain multiply (1.5 × 1.05 = 1.575), and a list is found from votes polled by dividing by the turnout.
Why the others are wrong
- (1)1,00,000 — Option (1) offers 1,00,000 voters on the list. RPSC's final key marks no option.
At 90% turnout a list of 1,00,000 means 1,00,000 × 0.9 = 90,000 votes polled, which is the figure printed in option (3).
- (2)81,000 — Option (2) offers 81,000 voters on the list. RPSC's final key marks no option.
81,000 is 90% of 90,000, the figure in option (3). As a list, it would mean 81,000 × 0.9 = 72,900 votes polled.
- (3)90,000 — Option (3) offers 90,000 voters on the list. RPSC's final key marks no option.
90,000 is 90% of 1,00,000, the figure in option (1). As a list, it would mean 90,000 × 0.9 = 81,000 votes polled, the figure in option (2).
- (4)1,10,000 — Option (4) offers 1,10,000 voters on the list. RPSC's final key marks no option.
At 90% turnout a list of 1,10,000 means 1,10,000 × 0.9 = 99,000 votes polled, with all of them valid under the stem's condition.
Concept
"X is p% more than Y" means X = Y × (1 + p/100). "X is p% less than Y" means X = Y × (1 − p/100).
Increases in a chain multiply rather than add. 50% more than a value that is itself 5% more than C gives 1.5 × 1.05 = 1.575 times C, a 57.5% increase.
A margin between two candidates is the difference of their multiples of the common unknown, so it fixes that unknown.
Turnout links votes and voters: votes polled = turnout × voters on the list, so voters on the list = votes polled ÷ turnout.
RPSC's 2021 syllabus lists "Percentage" and "Ratio, Proportion and Partnership" under Basic Numeracy in Reasoning & Mental Ability.
Writing the three candidates' votes as multiples of one of them turns percentages into a ratio: A : B : C = 1.575 : 1.05 : 1.
The same step, expressing every quantity in one unit, underlies problems on salaries, prices and populations that are compared by percentages.
Key facts
- X is p% more than Y means X = Y × (1 + p/100).
- Chained increases multiply: 50% more than a value that is 5% more than C is 1.5 × 1.05 = 1.575 times C.
- As multiples of C's votes c: A = 1.575c, B = 1.05c, C = c; together 3.625c.
- A's margin over C is 1.575c − c = 0.575c.
- With a 90% turnout and no invalid votes, voters on the list = total votes ÷ 0.9.
RPSC deleted this question in its final answer key; no option is marked.
Study next
Common traps
- Adding chained percentages. 50% more than B, where B is 5% more than C, is 57.5% more than C, not 55%.
- Scaling turnout the wrong way. The list is larger than the votes polled: list = votes ÷ 0.9, not votes × 0.9.
- Taking the margin between the wrong pair. The 18,000 is A's lead over C, not over B.
A question can link candidates' votes by percentages and a margin and ask for the total votes or the size of the voting list, as this one does.
A question can also add invalid votes or a turnout figure and ask for one candidate's votes.
Related PYQs
A reduction of 21% in the price of rice enables a person to buy 10.5 kg more for ₹ 1,000. What is the reduced price of rice per kg ?
- (1) ₹ 20
- (2) ₹ 30
- (3) ₹ 40
- (4) ₹ 15
Answer(1)
Same percentage reasoning. That question works from a 21% cut in the price of rice, which lets a person buy 10.5 kg more for ₹ 1,000, to the reduced price per kg (RPSC's key: ₹ 20); this deleted 2021 question chains two "more than" percentages with a margin and a turnout.
Practice
- practice — not a real PYQ
In an election between two candidates, 80% of the voters on the list voted and all votes were valid. The winner got 60% of the votes polled and won by 8,000 votes. How many voters were on the list?
- (a)40,000
- (b)50,000
- (c)32,000
- (d)48,000
Answer(2) — The winner's lead is 60% − 40% = 20% of the votes polled, so votes polled = 8,000 ÷ 0.2 = 40,000, and the list = 40,000 ÷ 0.8 = 50,000.Option (1) is the votes polled; option (3) multiplies by 0.8 instead of dividing; option (4) adds 20% to the votes polled.
- practice — not a real PYQ
P's salary is 20% more than Q's, and Q's salary is 10% more than R's. By what percentage is P's salary more than R's?
- (a)30%
- (b)32%
- (c)10%
- (d)20%
Answer(2) — P = 1.2 × Q = 1.2 × 1.1 × R = 1.32R, so P is 32% more than R. Option (1) adds the two percentages; options (3) and (4) take only one of the two increases.