Which one of the following Indian States has recorded negative growth of population as per Census 2011?
- (a)Manipur
- (b)Mizoram
- (c)Tripura
- (d)Nagaland
Correct — D, Nagaland. It was the only Indian State to record a fall in population between two censuses: 1,990,036 people in 2001 against 1,978,502 in 2011, a decadal growth rate of about −0·6 per cent. The reason is not that people left or that births collapsed. Scholars attribute the drop to the 2001 count having been inflated — enumeration in Nagaland had long been disputed, and several districts returned implausible growth in 1991 and 2001 — so the 2011 figure is treated as the more reliable of the two, and the apparent decline is largely a correction of the earlier over-count.
- (a)Manipur — Manipur grew between 2001 and 2011, like every other State except Nagaland. It is a plausible-looking option only because it belongs to the same small north-eastern group, where absolute numbers are low and a fall is easy to imagine.
- (b)Mizoram — Mizoram also grew over the decade. It is worth keeping separate for a different reason — it is the State with the lowest population density among the north-eastern hill States in Census 2011, and density is a different measure from growth.
- (c)Tripura — Tripura grew as well, and it is the most densely settled of the small north-eastern States. Nothing in the 2011 Census puts it in the negative-growth column.
Decadal growth rate is the percentage change in a State's population between two successive censuses. India's overall decadal growth for 2001–2011 was about 17·7 per cent, the first decade since independence in which the absolute number added was smaller than in the decade before. Within that national picture the range across States is wide, and Census 2011 threw up one genuinely singular case: Nagaland, alone among all the States, returned a smaller population than it had ten years earlier. The episode is a standard illustration of why census figures have to be read as measurements rather than as facts — a change in the count can reflect a change in the counting.
This is a single-fact recall item, and the safe anchor is that Nagaland is the only correct answer to the question 'which State shrank in Census 2011', in whatever wording it appears. The three distractors are chosen from the same neighbourhood so that a student who remembers only 'a small north-eastern State' cannot pick between them. Two present-day cautions matter for anyone studying this now. Census 2011 is still the latest completed census — the 2021 round was postponed and the next census is scheduled for 2027 — so 'as per Census 2011' remains the current figure rather than a historical one. And the negative growth should be described as a measured decline whose cause was probably an earlier over-count, not as depopulation.
- Nagaland was the only State to record a population decline in Census 2011, falling from 1,990,036 to 1,978,502.
- Its decadal growth rate for 2001–2011 was about −0·6 per cent.
- The decline is generally attributed to over-counting in the earlier censuses rather than to actual loss of population.
- India's overall decadal growth for 2001–2011 was about 17·7 per cent; Census 2011 remains the latest completed census.
Only one State in the whole country returned a smaller population in 2011 than in 2001.
- Confusing negative growth with low density. Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh are sparsely settled but both grew.
- Explaining the decline as migration or as a fall in births; the accepted explanation is a correction of earlier over-counting.
- Treating Census 2011 as out of date. It is still the latest completed census in India.
NDA asks for the State at one extreme of a Census 2011 measure — highest or lowest density, sex ratio, literacy or growth.
According to the Census 2011, the density of population in which one among the following States is the lowest ?
- (a) Sikkim
- (b) Nagaland
- (c) Manipur
- (d) Mizoram
Answer(d) Mizoram
Same Census 2011 material and almost the same four States, but testing density instead of growth — the pair together is the cleanest way to keep the two measures apart.
Which one of the following is the correct descending order of Indian States in terms of sex ratio as per Census 2011?
- (a) Mizoram—Manipur—Tripura—Meghalaya
- (b) Tripura—Manipur—Meghalaya—Mizoram
- (c) Meghalaya—Manipur—Mizoram—Tripura
- (d) Manipur—Meghalaya—Tripura—Mizoram
Answer(c) Meghalaya—Manipur—Mizoram—Tripura
The same paper's second Census 2011 item, drawn from the same north-eastern States — growth rate here, sex ratio eighteen questions later, from one data set.
- practice — not a real PYQ
According to Census 2011, which Indian State recorded the highest decadal growth rate of population?
- (a)Meghalaya
- (b)Bihar
- (c)Uttar Pradesh
- (d)Kerala
Answer(a) Meghalaya — it topped the States at roughly 27 per cent, while Nagaland alone recorded a decline.
- practice — not a real PYQ
The decadal growth rate of a State is calculated as the percentage change in its population
- (a)over the previous financial year
- (b)between two successive censuses
- (c)since independence
- (d)per thousand of the national population
Answer(b) between two successive censuses — which in India are taken ten years apart.