The magnetic field strength of a current-carrying wire at a particular distance from the axis of the wire
- (a)depends upon the current in the wire
- (b)depends upon the radius of the wire
- (c)depends upon the temperature of the surroundings
- (d)None of the above
Correct — A, depends upon the current in the wire. For a long straight conductor the magnetic field at a point outside it, a distance r from the axis, is B = μ₀I ÷ 2πr. Only two quantities appear in that expression — the current I flowing in the wire and the distance r from its axis. Double the current and the field doubles; move twice as far out and the field halves. The question fixes the distance by saying 'at a particular distance from the axis', so the one thing left that the field can depend on is the current, and that is what statement (a) says. The thickness of the wire does not enter, and neither does the temperature of the room.
- (b)depends upon the radius of the wire — For any point outside the conductor the field is exactly what it would be if the whole current ran along the axis as a thin line, so the wire's own radius drops out of the answer. The radius matters only for a point inside the conducting material, where the field grows with distance from the axis instead of falling.
- (c)depends upon the temperature of the surroundings — Temperature changes the resistance of the wire and so, in a real circuit driven by a fixed voltage, can change the current it carries. But that is an effect on the current, not on the relation between current and field, and the field itself is set by the current flowing at that moment.
- (d)None of the above — This can only be correct if all three preceding statements fail, and the first one plainly holds — the field around a current-carrying wire is proportional to the current. A 'none of the above' option is worth a moment's thought precisely because it is defeated by any single true statement above it.
A steady current produces a magnetic field around itself. For a long straight wire the field lines are concentric circles lying in planes perpendicular to the wire, and their direction is given by the right-hand thumb rule — point the thumb of the right hand along the current and the curl of the fingers gives the sense of the field. The magnitude falls off as one over the distance from the wire, which is a slower fall than the inverse-square laws of gravitation and electrostatics because the source here is a line rather than a point.
Every question of this family is answered by writing the formula down first and reading the answer off it. B = μ₀I ÷ 2πr for a straight wire; B = μ₀nI for the inside of a long solenoid, with n the turns per unit length; B = μ₀I ÷ 2R at the centre of a circular loop of radius R. Once the expression is on paper, questions about what the field does or does not depend on answer themselves — the solenoid field, for instance, does not depend on the solenoid's radius either, and NDA has asked that too. The one refinement worth carrying is that 'outside the wire' is doing quiet work in this item; inside the conducting material the radius genuinely does matter.
- For a long straight wire, B = μ₀I ÷ 2πr — proportional to the current, inversely proportional to the distance from the axis.
- The field lines are concentric circles in planes perpendicular to the wire, with their sense given by the right-hand thumb rule.
- Outside the conductor the field is the same as if the entire current were concentrated along the axis.
- Inside a long solenoid the field is uniform and equals μ₀nI, independent of the solenoid's radius.
- μ₀, the permeability of free space, is 4π × 10⁻⁷ T m A⁻¹.
With the distance fixed by the question, only the current is left — option (a).
- Assuming a thicker wire must produce a stronger field at the same distance outside it.
- Bringing temperature in because resistance depends on it; the question is about the field-current relation.
- Reaching for 'none of the above' without first checking whether any of the three statements is true.
NDA tests this relation almost every session — sometimes as a dependence question like this one, sometimes as a direction question using the right-hand thumb rule.
The magnetic field produced by a current-carrying straight wire at a point outside the wire depends
- (a) inversely on the distance from it
- (b) directly on the distance from it
- (c) inversely at short distances and directly at large distances from it
- (d) directly on the distance (at short distances) and inversely on the distance (at long distances) from it
Answer(a) inversely on the distance from it
The same formula tested on its other variable — this item fixes the distance and asks about the current, that one fixes the current and asks about the distance.
In a solenoid, the current flowing through the wire is I and number of turns per unit length is n. This gives a magnetic field B inside the solenoid. If number of turn per unit length is increased to 2n, what will be the value of magnetic field in the solenoid ?
- (a) B
- (b) 2B
- (c) B/2
- (d) B/4
Answer(b) 2B
The companion formula for a solenoid, worked the same way — write the expression down and read the dependence off it.
- practice — not a real PYQ
The current in a long straight wire is doubled and the point of observation is moved to twice its original distance from the axis. The magnetic field at the new point is
- (a)four times the original
- (b)twice the original
- (c)the same as the original
- (d)one quarter of the original
Answer(c) the same as the original — B is proportional to I and inversely proportional to r, so doubling both leaves the field unchanged.
- practice — not a real PYQ
The magnetic field inside a long current-carrying solenoid depends on
- (a)the radius of the solenoid
- (b)the number of turns per unit length and the current
- (c)the length of the solenoid only
- (d)the temperature of the core
Answer(b) the number of turns per unit length and the current — B = μ₀nI, in which the solenoid's radius does not appear.