My old teacher gave many poor students money <u>in spite of</u> he was poor.
- (a)even though
- (b)as if
- (c)however
- (d)NO IMPROVEMENT
Correct — A, even though. What follows the underlined words is a full clause with its own subject and verb, 'he was poor', and only a conjunction can introduce that; 'even though' is the conjunction of concession, which is exactly the meaning the sentence needs — the teacher gave although he had little himself.
- (b)as if — 'As if' does take a clause, but it introduces a supposed comparison, so the sentence would say the teacher gave money in the manner of a poor man rather than in spite of being one.
- (c)however — 'However' is a linking adverb, not a conjunction; it can begin a new sentence or follow a semicolon, but it cannot join two clauses inside one sentence the way this slot requires.
- (d)NO IMPROVEMENT — 'In spite of' is a preposition and can only be followed by a noun, a pronoun or an -ing form, so putting the clause 'he was poor' after it is the very error being tested.
The tested difference is between a preposition, which takes a noun-like object, and a conjunction, which takes a whole clause.
The quickest check on any item of this kind is to look at what comes immediately after the underlined words. If it is a subject with a finite verb, the linking word must be a conjunction. 'In spite of' would have been correct before a noun or an -ing form — 'in spite of his poverty', 'in spite of being poor' — and the exam turns that distinction into an item by leaving a clause behind it instead.
- 'In spite of' and 'despite' are prepositions; 'although', 'though' and 'even though' are conjunctions of concession.
- 'Despite of' is not English — 'despite' never takes 'of'.
- Following 'in spite of' or 'despite' with a full clause.
- Using 'however' as though it could join two clauses without a semicolon or a full stop.
Asked as a sentence-improvement item in which a preposition is planted where the grammar of the second half demands a conjunction.
I disliked him not so much for his meanness <u>but for</u> his dishonesty.
- (a) as for
- (b) but because
- (c) but due to
- (d) No improvement
Answer(a) as for
Both items replace a wrongly chosen linking word. There 'not so much' can only be completed by 'as', not by 'but'; here a clause can only be introduced by a conjunction, not by the preposition 'in spite of'.
- practice — not a real PYQ
Which option best improves the underlined part — <u>Despite of</u> the heavy rain, the match was played to a finish.
- (a)In spite
- (b)Despite
- (c)Although
- (d)No improvement
Answer(b) Despite — 'despite' never takes 'of', and the phrase after it is a noun, not a clause.
- practice — not a real PYQ
Which option best improves the underlined part — She kept working <u>in spite of</u> she was unwell.
- (a)although
- (b)in spite
- (c)besides
- (d)No improvement
Answer(a) although — a full clause follows, so a conjunction is required.