Which one of the following writs means 'you may have the body'?
- (a)Habeas Corpus
- (b)Mandamus
- (c)Certiorari
- (d)Quo Warranto
Correct — A, Habeas Corpus. The Latin phrase habeas corpus is the operative opening of the old English writ, and it means literally that you may have the body — the command to a person detaining another to produce that person before the court and justify the detention. It is the remedy against unlawful confinement, and the court's inquiry is narrow and quick: is there lawful authority for holding this person, and if not, release follows. In India it may be issued by the Supreme Court under Article 32 and by every High Court under Article 226, against the State and, unlike most of the writs, against a private person as well — a wife held by her family, a child held by someone with no right to custody. The other three names are also Latin and also describe what the writ does, which is why translating each one is the whole exercise.
- (b)Mandamus — Mandamus means we command. It is an order to a public authority, an inferior court or a tribunal to perform a public duty it has refused or failed to perform; it does not lie against a private person unless that person has been entrusted with a public duty.
- (c)Certiorari — Certiorari means to be certified, or to be informed. It is issued by a higher court to a lower court or a tribunal to quash an order already passed, on the ground of excess of jurisdiction or an error apparent on the face of the record.
- (d)Quo Warranto — Quo warranto means by what authority. It calls on a person occupying a public office to show the legal warrant for holding it, and lies only where the office is public and is created by statute or by the Constitution itself.
The Constitution makes the writs a fundamental right rather than a discretionary remedy. Article 32 lets a person move the Supreme Court directly for the enforcement of Part III rights and empowers that Court to issue directions or orders or writs, including habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari. Article 226 gives the High Courts the same power in wider terms — for the enforcement of fundamental rights and for any other purpose. Ambedkar called Article 32 the heart and soul of the Constitution because without it the rights in Part III would be declarations only.
This is a translation question, and the safest preparation is to learn all five writs by their literal meaning, because the meaning tells you the function. You may have the body points at the person being held; we command points at a duty not performed; to be informed points at a record being called up for review; by what authority points at a title to office; and prohibition, the fifth writ, simply forbids an inferior court to go on with a case beyond its jurisdiction. Two distinctions are worth carrying alongside. Certiorari quashes an order already made, while prohibition stops proceedings still going on. And habeas corpus is the only one of the five that will ordinarily lie against a private individual.
- Habeas corpus — you may have the body; a command to produce a detained person before the court and justify the detention.
- Mandamus — we command; an order to perform a public duty.
- Certiorari — to be certified or informed; quashes an order of a lower court or tribunal.
- Quo warranto — by what authority; questions the holding of a public office.
- Prohibition — the fifth writ; stops an inferior court or tribunal from continuing proceedings beyond its jurisdiction.
- Translating certiorari as to command; that is mandamus.
- Assuming no writ lies against a private person; habeas corpus does.
- Treating Article 32 and Article 226 as identical; Article 226 also runs for any other purpose, beyond Fundamental Rights.
As a meaning-to-writ match, as which writ lies in a described situation, or as which of these is not a writ at all.
A Writ of Prohibition is an order issued by the Supreme Court or High Courts to:
- (a) a government officer prohibiting him from taking a particular action
- (b) the Parliament/Legislative Assembly to pass a law on Prohibition
- (c) the lower court prohibiting continuation of proceedings in a case
- (d) the Government prohibiting it from following an unconstitutional policy
Answer(c) the lower court prohibiting continuation of proceedings in a case
The fifth writ, tested by function rather than by translation. Prohibition and certiorari both address an inferior court, and the line between them — stopping proceedings against quashing an order — is the commonest follow-up to this CDS item.
Which one of the following is not a writ?
- (a) Mandamus
- (b) Habeas Corpus
- (c) Certiorari
- (d) Severability
Answer(d) Severability
The same five names with an intruder added. Severability is a doctrine for reading down a statute, not a remedy a court issues, and spotting that depends on the same habit of translating each Latin term.
CDS_GK_2020_II_Q232020Which one of the following is not the necessary condition for the issue of a writ of Quo Warranto?
- (a) The office must be a public office.
- (b) The office must be created by the Statute or by the Constitution itself.
- (c) The office must not be a substantive one.
- (d) There has been a contravention of the Constitution or a Statute in appropriating such person to that office.
Answer(c) The office must not be a substantive one.
Quo warranto in detail, from the same paper series. The office must be public, statutory or constitutional, and substantive — the option that denies the last of these is the one that fails.
- practice — not a real PYQ
The writ of quo warranto is issued to
- (a)produce a detained person before the court
- (b)question a person's authority to hold a public office
- (c)compel a public authority to perform its duty
- (d)quash an order of a lower court
Answer(b) question a person's authority to hold a public office — the phrase means by what authority.
- practice — not a real PYQ
Which one of the following writs is issued to stop an inferior court from continuing proceedings beyond its jurisdiction?
- (a)Certiorari
- (b)Prohibition
- (c)Mandamus
- (d)Habeas Corpus
Answer(b) Prohibition — certiorari quashes an order already made, prohibition stops proceedings still under way.