View answer copy →Answered a very similar question
Their question: “Case: Aravalli illegal mining; journalist Sahoo bribed to suppress investigative report”
2022_Q11 is essentially the same case, Aravalli illegal stone mining, an SP killed by a mining truck, and a journalist bribed to bury his exposé; the topper even cites the real SP Surender Bishnoi incident and runs a clean option-evaluation.
Key learnings from their answer
- ›In every case study (Q7-Q11) he runs a clean two-column Merit/Demerit evaluation of each option *before* committing to a reasoned 'I would choose...' verdict, rather than jumping straight to a conclusion -> In case studies, visibly weigh each option's pros and cons in a comparison layout first, then justify your choice, the examiner rewards the structured reasoning trail, not just the 'right' final answer.
- ›Vikas pairs each ethics concept with a strikingly *current* concrete instance instead of textbook stock examples, 'All eyes on Rafah' AI-generated image for gen-AI's social utility, the Rashmika Mandanna/Sachin Tendulkar/PM Modi deepfakes for betting-app fraud, SEBI's 'Endorsement Know-Hows' guidelines in the finfluencer case, and SP Surender Bishnoi's real Aravalli sand-mafia death in Case 8 -> Mine the last 12-18 months of news for one named, verifiable example per ethics theme; a 2024-25 instance signals you actually follow ethics-in-action and instantly out-scores a generic 'a corrupt officer' illustration.
What they cited: Case 8: SP Surender Bishnoi killed by sand-mafia truck in Aravalli (real incident); Einstein attribution on cowardice
