View answer copy →Answered a very similar question
Their question: “Neha (DM) — ex-gratia for a deceased garbage-truck driver (Rajiv); compassion vs rules”
The same compassion-vs-rules weighing he uses for ex-gratia is the exact template for the destitute woman who deserves scheme support but lacks the documents.
Key learnings from their answer
- ›In the case studies (Q7 Kulkarni's scholarship-fund diversion, Q9 Neha's ex-gratia, Q10 dowry) he drew merit/demerit 'lens' schematics and took a clear reasoned stand under headings like 'Course of Action' and 'Ethical dilemmas' rather than hedging -> in ethics case studies, lay out the options visually with a stakeholder/merit-demerit weighing AND then commit to a decision, because examiners reward a defensible verdict over a balanced non-answer.

