View answer copy →Answered a closely related question
Their question: “Case study — senior IAS up for Chief Secretary; PWD tender favouring CM's son-in-law's Company X (250w, max 20)”
2018_CS4 is the same species of case, a political master pressuring a senior officer to manipulate a public project for a relative's benefit while dangling a personal inducement; the topper's stakeholder/merit-demerit skeleton solves both.
Key learnings from their answer
- ›He runs an identical 5-step skeleton on EVERY Section-B case study: Stakeholders -> Issues involved -> Options available (each weighed with an explicit Merit/Demerit pair) -> chosen option -> long-term measures (used across the Sarpanch-on-paper, shelter-home rape, Chief Secretary PWD-tender, and SPV power-plant cases). -> Build one reusable case-study template and apply it mechanically so under exam pressure you never freeze on 'how do I structure this 20-marker', the Merit/Demerit weighing of each option is what shows the examiner you reasoned rather than jumped to a verdict.