Fill in the blank with the most appropriate option: Rarely _____ such an overwhelming consensus among critics.
- (a)has there been
- (b)there has been
- (c)was there
- (d)had been
Answer
Why
Correct — A. The trigger is Rarely at the front of the clause. A negative adverb in that position brings inversion: the auxiliary comes before the subject, as in a question.
Here the subject slot is filled by there, so the order is auxiliary + there + been:
Rarely has there been such an overwhelming consensus among critics → option (a).
The verb is singular has because the noun it agrees with, consensus, is singular.
Why the others are wrong
- (b)there has been — There has been keeps normal statement order. After a fronted Rarely the auxiliary must come first: Rarely has there been, not Rarely there has been.
- (c)was there — Was there is correctly inverted, but it places the sentence in a finished past period the sentence never names. With no past time given, the present perfect has there been fits.
- (d)had been — Had been leaves out there, so nothing fills the subject slot after the auxiliary. The past perfect would also need a past reference point that the sentence never gives.
Concept
Negative inversion: when a clause opens with a negative or restrictive word such as never, rarely, seldom, hardly, scarcely or little, the first auxiliary moves in front of the subject.
Normal order: There has rarely been such a consensus.
Fronted: Rarely has there been such a consensus.
In a there-sentence, there takes the subject position for the inversion, and the verb agrees with the noun that follows.
Was there is not wrong in every sentence. 'In those years, rarely was there such a consensus' is sound, because it names a finished past period.
This sentence names none, so it speaks of the whole time up to now. That is the work of the present perfect, has there been.
Key facts
- A fronted negative adverb inverts the auxiliary and subject: Rarely have I seen such rain.
- In a there-sentence, there takes the subject position in the inversion: Rarely has there been.
- In a there-sentence the verb agrees with the noun that follows: has there been a consensus, have there been complaints.
- Without the fronted adverb the order is normal: There has rarely been such a consensus.
Study next
Common traps
- Picking there has been because it reads naturally, missing that the fronted Rarely demands inversion
- Picking was there because it is inverted, without checking whether the sentence gives a past time frame
- Inverting after a cleft opener, where It was not until the report leaked that the ministry acted keeps normal order
Here the blank tests the inverted order itself. 17 Sep 2025, 12:30, English Q.12 keys 'Rarely if ever have there been a time' as the error, because the verb must agree with a time.
In this paper, 16 Sep 2025, 16:00, English Q.9 shows the pattern after Only after: 'did the historian manage'.
17 Sep 2025, 16:00, English Q.12 keys the opposite fault, inversion inside the cleft It was not until … that.
Related PYQs
No directly related past PYQ was found.