Read the following passage and answer the questions based on the passage :
Democracy is frequently extolled as the political system that best guarantees individual liberty. Enshrined in constitutional rights and protected by the rule of law, freedom of speech, association, religion, and conscience are regarded as hallmarks of democratic governance. However, what is less frequently acknowledged—but equally vital—is the reciprocal pillar of responsibility without which such freedoms can degenerate into chaos, polarization, or authoritarian backlashes. Freedom in a democracy is not absolute; it exists within a framework of mutual restraint and civic discipline. The right to express dissent, for instance, is foundational. Yet when freedom of expression is weaponized to disseminate hate speech, misinformation, or seditious propaganda, it ceases to serve the democratic cause. Responsibility thus entails a conscious engagement with the implications of one’s actions—not just their legality, but their ethical and civic consequences. The challenge lies in reconciling liberty with accountability in pluralistic societies. With diverse cultural, ideological, and economic constituencies, democracies are inherently sites of contention. In such contexts, responsibility demands more than legal compliance—it requires empathy, critical thinking, and a commitment to collective well-being. A citizen’s right to protest, for example, must be exercised with awareness of public order and respect for differing viewpoints. Similarly, the freedom to vote must be matched by an obligation to make informed choices, unswayed by populism, prejudice, or manipulation. The tension between freedom and responsibility is perhaps most visible during moments of crisis—be it a pandemic, a communal riot, or a constitutional standoff. In such times, the temptation to prioritize personal liberty at the cost of collective safety can prove fatal. Refusal to wear masks during a health emergency or the viral spread of unverified news during civil unrest exemplify how unbridled freedom can undermine democratic resilience. Moreover, democracy itself is not self-sustaining; it requires vigilant citizens who recognize that rights are not entitlements in perpetuity, but privileges preserved through active participation. When freedom is divorced from responsibility, democratic institutions become vulnerable to erosion—from within. Demagogues often rise not solely because of state failure, but due to civic apathy or irresponsible use of democratic freedoms by the populace itself. Therefore, in any functioning democracy, freedom and responsibility are not opposing forces but mutually reinforcing imperatives. The preservation of liberty necessitates a citizenry capable of ethical judgment, informed debate, and constructive dissent. In the absence of responsibility, freedom risks transforming from a catalyst of justice into a vehicle of division. Democracy survives not just through the laws it enacts, but through the civic virtues its citizens embody.
What tone best describes the author's stance on freedom in democracy?
- (a)Cynical and dismissive
- (b)Balanced and cautionary
- (c)Indifferent and neutral
- (d)Overly optimistic
Answer
Why
Correct — B. The option has two halves, and the passage shows both.
Balanced: the author values freedom — dissent "is foundational" — and still insists on responsibility, concluding that the two "are not opposing forces but mutually reinforcing imperatives".
Cautionary: the warnings run from start to close — freedoms "can degenerate into chaos", liberty in a crisis "can prove fatal", freedom "risks transforming from a catalyst of justice into a vehicle of division" → option (b).
Why the others are wrong
- (a)Cynical and dismissive — Cynical and dismissive does not fit an author who calls dissent "foundational" and freedom "a catalyst of justice". The doubt is about misuse, not about freedom.
- (c)Indifferent and neutral — Indifferent and neutral misses a clear position: the author says what citizens must do and draws a conclusion with "Therefore".
- (d)Overly optimistic — Overly optimistic ignores the warnings: democracy "is not self-sustaining" and institutions are "vulnerable to erosion—from within".
Concept
Tone is the author's attitude, read from word choice. An option that pairs two words is right only if both fit.
Balance shows where an author grants one side while arguing another: freedoms are "hallmarks of democratic governance", and responsibility is their "reciprocal pillar".
Caution shows in risk words: degenerate, weaponized, fatal, erosion, division. Valuing something while warning about its misuse reads as balanced and cautionary.
Neutral tempts on a calm, formal passage. Calm is not neutral: this author argues a position and tells citizens what they must do.
Key facts
- Cautionary: warning of a risk or danger.
- Balanced: giving weight to more than one side.
- Cynical: distrustful of people's motives or sincerity.
Study next
Common traps
- Choosing 'indifferent and neutral' because the prose is formal — formal is not neutral when the author argues a position.
- Choosing 'cynical' because the passage lists dangers — warning against misuse is caution, not cynicism.
Tone is also asked with a two-word key at 14 Sep 2025, 12:30, English Q.18 (keyed Hopeful and critical) and at 18 Sep 2025, 12:30, English Q.20 (keyed Reflective and critical).
Related PYQs
No directly related past PYQ was found.