Two right-angled triangular blocks, ABC and DEF, have ∠B=∠E=90°. If the lengths of the hypotenuses AC and DF are equal, and the sides AB and DE are equal, are the triangles congruent? If so, by what rule?
- (a)Yes, by SSS
- (b)Yes, by SAS
- (c)Yes, by RHS
- (d)Yes, by ASA
Answer
Why
Correct — C. Match what is given to a congruence rule.
∠B = ∠E = 90°: a right angle
AC = DF: the hypotenuse
AB = DE: one other side
Right angle, Hypotenuse, Side is the RHS rule, so the triangles are congruent → option (c)
Why the others are wrong
- (a)Yes, by SSS — SSS needs all three pairs of sides given. BC = EF is not given; it follows from Pythagoras, and RHS is the rule that packages exactly that step.
- (b)Yes, by SAS — SAS needs the angle between the two given sides. The right angle at B lies between AB and BC, not between AB and the hypotenuse AC.
- (d)Yes, by ASA — ASA needs two pairs of equal angles and the side between them. The data give one angle pair, ∠B = ∠E, plus two sides.
Concept
RHS (Right angle–Hypotenuse–Side): two right-angled triangles are congruent when the hypotenuse and one other side of one equal those of the other.
The given angle is not between the two given sides, so SAS cannot be applied straight away. The right angle is what makes it work: Pythagoras fixes the third side, BC = √(AC² − AB²) = √(DF² − DE²) = EF.
The standard congruence rules are SSS, SAS, ASA, AAS and RHS. AAA is not one of them: equal angles fix the shape of a triangle but not its size, so AAA gives similarity only.
Key facts
- RHS: a right angle, the hypotenuse and one other side equal → the right triangles are congruent.
- In SAS the equal angle must be the one included between the two equal sides.
- Equal angles alone (AAA) prove similarity, not congruence.
Study next
Common traps
- Choosing SAS because two sides and an angle are given, without checking that the angle lies between those sides.
- Choosing SSS after computing BC = EF by Pythagoras — that side is derived, and the rule matching the given data is RHS.
The same 'are they congruent, and by what rule?' frame appears 19 Sep 2025, 16:00, Quant Q.20, where an angle bisector with AB = AC gives SAS, and 19 Sep 2025, 09:00, Quant Q.20, where a diagonal with AB = CD and ∠ABD = ∠CDB gives SAS.
10 Sep 2024, 09:00, Quant Q.3 turns it round: angle-angle-angle is the criterion that cannot prove congruence.
Related PYQs
No directly related past PYQ was found.