View answer copy →Answered a closely related question
Their question: “Ethical implications of Generative AI”
The PYQ asks for the key ethical dilemmas of digital/social-media technology (misinformation, privacy, deepfakes), which the topper's Generative-AI ethics answer covers point-for-point.
Key learnings from their answer
- ›Vimal anchors nearly every numbered point to a named, concrete 'eg' callout rather than abstract assertion, Palak Muchhal's 3000 children's heart surgeries (compassion), MS Dhoni's 2007 WC last over and 2011 captaincy (emotional intelligence/decision-making), Bezwada Wilson eradicating manual scavenging, IPS Atal Kulkarni's Bharosa Cell, E. Sreedharan and Satyendra Dubey -> in Ethics, attach a specific real person/event to each value-claim; a stocked, varied example bank turns generic ethics points into evidence.
- ›He hard-anchors ethics answers in law and the Constitution, Articles 39(b)/(c), 21, 43A, KS Puttaswamy (privacy) on the police data-leak case, SC/ST Atrocities Act 1989 on the caste-discrimination case (Q12), Companies Act 2013 and RTE -> in GS4, citing the precise article/statute that governs the dilemma adds rigour and shows the answer is grounded, not just sentimental.
What they cited: ChatGPT / Microsoft GenAI; deepfake porn via Generative AI