View answer copy →Answered a very similar question
Their question: “Case study — Ravi Kumar, District Collector, flood disaster management; evacuation priority, disclosure vs panic, relief and recovery (max 20)”
The 2015 case asks exactly for an evacuation/rescue-prioritisation order in a cloudburst-flood disaster; Aakash's flood-Collector answer (rescue-priority logic, disclose maximum information to avoid panic) is a direct model.
Key learnings from their answer
- ›Every case study (Q7-Q12, 20 marks each) consistently opens with a stakeholder list, then explicitly commits to a single 'best course of action' instead of hedging, e.g. Sonia Patel should disclose and seek a formal inquiry, and Collector Ravi Kumar should disclose maximum information to avoid panic -> in case studies, identify stakeholders up front and take a clear, defensible decision; evaluators reward a candidate who chooses and justifies over one who lists options and sits on the fence.
