Increased national wealth did not result in equitable distribution of its benefits. It has created only some "enclaves of modernity and prosperity for a small minority at the cost of the majority." Justify.

Key learnings from their answer

• ›He opens answers with a crisp one-line definition and underlines the thinker-terms he invokes - Kant's human dignity in the Oxfam inequality answer, Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam, Nishkama Karma -> Lead with a sharp definition and visually flag your keywords (underline) so an examiner skimming the page instantly sees you've used the right ethical vocabulary.
• ›He anchors nearly every numbered point with a concrete 'eg:' case rather than a generic claim - e.g. Awanish Sharan's bike ambulances for innovation, the Uttarakhand social audit that exposed 11,000 fake pensioners for accountability, Ira Singhal hiring transgenders for inclusion, and Chhavi Rajawat / Lijjat Papad / Jaga Mission for grassroots empowerment -> Build a personal bank of 2-3 real, specific administrative cases per ethics theme so you can attach a named example to each point instead of writing in abstractions.