Integrity without knowledge is weak and useless, but knowledge without integrity is dangerous and dreadful. What do you understand by this statement? Explain your stand with illustrations from the modern context.

Key learnings from their answer

• ›Every answer opened by defining the key term, underlined, which the evaluator singled out twice ('very well defined the key term', 'your habit of introducing with defining key terminologies is good') -> lead each ethics answer with a crisp definition of the central concept (aptitude, probity, ethical dilemma) before any discussion; it is a low-cost, repeatable opening that examiners reward.
• ›He sourced examples widely and matched each to the exact point: Armstrong Pame (IAS) building a ~100 km road without government funds for attitude/leadership, the Odisha 'millet lady' reviving 30+ native millets, Satyam scam and Rajat Gupta insider trading for corporate-governance failures, and Osama Bin Laden as 'knowledge without integrity' for the Samuel Johnson quote -> keep a small bank of versatile real examples (an IAS innovator, a corporate scandal, an unconventional changemaker) and deploy the specific one that fits the prompt's exact theme, not a generic name-drop.