22 is related to 176 following a certain logic. Following the same logic, 32 is related to 256. To which of the following is 48 related, following the same logic? (NOTE: Operations should be performed on the whole numbers, without breaking down the numbers into its constituent digits. E.g. 13 – Operations on 13 such as adding /deleting /multiplying etc. to 13 can be performed. Breaking down 13 into 1 and 3 and then performing mathematical operations on 1 and 3 is not allowed)
- (a)370
- (b)380
- (c)374
- (d)384
Answer
Why
Correct — D. Rule: second number = first number × 8.
176 ÷ 22 = 8
256 ÷ 32 = 8
One constant ratio explains both given pairs, so apply it to 48:
48 × 8 = 40 × 8 + 8 × 8
= 320 + 64 = 384, option (d).
A faster check: only 384 divides by 8 exactly, so the other three fail before you multiply at all.
Why the others are wrong
- (a)370 — 370 is not a multiple of 8 — 370 ÷ 8 = 46.25 — so it cannot be a whole number multiplied by 8.
- (b)380 — 380 ÷ 8 = 47.5. Like 370 it is a round-looking number that fails the divisibility check on one line of work.
- (c)374 — 374 sits 10 below 384 and is the near miss, but 374 ÷ 8 = 46.75. It catches anyone who slips in the 40 × 8 + 8 × 8 split.
Concept
An A is related to B item hands you two worked examples so that one operation can be pinned down. Divide before anything else: 176 ÷ 22 = 8 and 256 ÷ 32 = 8.
If the quotients had disagreed, the next tests in order are difference, then n² ± k, then n × (n ± 1).
The note attached to the stem forbids breaking a number into its digits, which is SSC saying in advance that the answer is not a digit trick.
All four options lie between 370 and 384, so this is a pure multiplication check. Testing each option for divisibility by 8 eliminates three of them without any multiplication.
Key facts
- 176 ÷ 22 = 8 and 256 ÷ 32 = 8.
- 48 × 8 = 384.
- Of the four options only 384 is divisible by 8.
Study next
Common traps
- Testing a difference first, since 176 − 22 = 154 and 256 − 32 = 224 do not match
- Computing 48 × 8 as 8 × 40 + 8 × 6 and arriving at 368
- Splitting 48 into 4 and 8, which the printed note forbids
The same wrapper is set at 09 Sep 2024, 09:00, Reasoning Q.24 (19 → 209, 27 → 297, ratio 11) and at 11 Sep 2024, 09:00, Reasoning Q.20 (16 → 112, 26 → 182, ratio 7). Both are constant-ratio, so the quotient is always the first thing to take.
Related PYQs
No directly related past PYQ was found.