1.Chhattisgarh CFRR Directive Withdrawal (Forest Rights Act)
What & Where
CFRR – Section 3(1)(i), Forest Rights Act 2006; legal right of STs/OTFDs to manage customary forest resource.
Governance via Gram Sabha inside mapped community forest boundary; includes protection, regeneration, NTFP use.
July 2025: Chhattisgarh withdrew order making Forest Dept nodal; clash with National Working Plan Code 2023.
Quick Facts for MCQs
Legal & Policy
- Primacy – FRA overrides Indian Forest Act within CFR areas; Gram Sabha holds final say.
- NWPC 2023 criticised for timber-centric, top-down approach undermining community rights.
- Court watch – SC decisions insist executive cannot dilute FRA without legislation.
Governance Tools
- Finance Commission urged dedicated devolution to CFR Gram Sabhas for conservation works.
- Dharti Aaba Abhiyan provides iterative template for Gram Sabha forest management plans.
- Odisha, Maharashtra using GIS dashboards; demand for national CFR tracker.
Conservation & Livelihood
- NTFP trade (bamboo, honey, herbs) legally shifts profits to resident communities.
- Community plans adaptive to climate variability, unlike 10-year static working plans.
- Empowered villagers curb illegal logging, mining, enhancing biodiversity and carbon stocks.
Key Data Points
| Feature | Data-Point |
|---|---|
| Parent law | FRA 2006 |
| Section granting CFRR | 3(1)(i) |
| Eligible groups | Scheduled Tribes & Other Traditional Forest Dwellers |
| Statutory governing body | Gram Sabha |
| Nodal ministry for FRA | Ministry of Tribal Affairs |
| Conflicting code | National Working Plan Code 2023 |
| Key livelihood provision | Ownership of Minor Forest Produce |
| Supreme Court support case | Wildlife First v. MoEFCC 2019 |
Related UPSC Prelims PYQs
Under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, who shall be the authority to initiate the process for determining the nature and extent of individual or community forest rights or both?
Which one of the following statements is not true with regard to tribal welfare?







