View answer copy →Lokesh YadavRank 190
Answered a very similar question
Their question: “Case: homeowner / homeless man / fleeing victim — analogy to global refugee crisis (20m)”
2021 Q12 is the refugee non-refoulement ethics question; the topper's refugee-crisis case (Rohingya, New York Declaration, 'humanity is the biggest religion') is exactly the ethical dimension in play.
Key learnings from their answer
- ›Section B case studies lead with a hand-drawn stakeholder web plus a clean three-column Option/Merit/Demerit table (seen across his case answers), turning a wall of text into a scannable decision framework. Lesson: for case studies, externalise your reasoning visually, a stakeholder map plus an options-and-tradeoffs table proves you weighed alternatives before deciding.
- ›He pairs theory with a specific, recent, named hook in the same answer instead of vague gestures, Q10 stacks the Lancet finding (climate change risking migration of 1bn+ people in 50 years) with CAMPA fund, International Solar Alliance and the Paris Climate Deal; Q12 nails the passive-euthanasia mechanism (the SC verdict, the living will, the 3-member expert doctor board, DM sanction). Lesson: anchor each ethics/case answer with one concrete data point or a precise procedural detail (named journal, named scheme, the actual safeguard), not a generic 'studies show'.
What they cited: Q13: Aristotle's Teleological Argument; Rohingya crisis; New York Declaration on Refugees
Quotes used: “Q13 (candidate's own closing line): 'Humanity is the biggest religion!!'”