View answer copy →Answered a closely related question
Their question: “Environmental ethics; how laws and ethics differ”
Her two-column Laws-vs-Ethics table (with the Holocaust as legal-but-unethical) directly answers 2016 Q10's demand to show how law and ethics differ in their approaches.
Key learnings from their answer
- ›She compresses arguments into labelled visuals, a boxed triangle of Principles + Values + Emotions converging on 'ethical dilemma' (Q1), a two-column LAWS vs ETHICS table (Q2a), and a flow diagram from 'academic development affected' to girl-child dropout/child labour (Q3b). Lesson: use diagrams to carry the structure of definitions and comparisons; note the examiner's 'enclose diagram in a box', always frame diagrams cleanly so they read as deliberate, not scribbled.
What they cited: Q2(a): the 'pipal' tree worshipped since Harappan times; Yadadri Tree Model of urban forestry (Telangana); Tulasi Gowda (Padma Shri); the 'elephant doctor' of Assam (Padma Shri); Idu Mishmi tribe of Arunachal treating tigers as kin; abortion laws (context-dependence); the Holocaust in Germany (legal but unethical); affirmative-action laws