“India’s relations with Israel have, of late, acquired a depth and diversity, which cannot be rolled back.” Discuss.

Key learnings from their answer

• ›He carries every international-relations answer with a labelled sketch-map, the OBOR-vs-AAGC world map (Q15), Israel-Palestine (Q16), and the India-Bhutan-China map marking Chumbi Valley and the Chicken's Neck (Q20). -> For IR questions, a quick annotated map naming the actual chokepoints/corridors (Chabahar, Gwadar, Chumbi Valley) earns value-addition marks that pure prose cannot.

Key learnings from their answer

• ›He uses memorable, self-coined framing devices to make a point stick, for Q20 (India-Israel) he coins the 'ITIT = IITT' wordplay to capture the relationship. -> A crisp original mnemonic or phrasing can give an otherwise standard answer a distinctive, examiner-memorable edge, as long as it genuinely compresses your argument rather than being decoration.
• ›His IR answers are deliberately example-dense and current: Q19 (India-US) packs in STA-1 status, Malabar and Vajra Prahar exercises, the S-400 deal, and H-1B and WTO solar/food-subsidy disputes, showing both cooperation and divergence with concrete instances. -> Build IR 'examine with recent developments' answers from a stock of named exercises, agreements, and live disputes so each claim is backed by a specific, datable fact rather than generalities.