Who among the following translated 300 volumes of Sanskrit books collected by Firoz Tughlaq during the campaign of Nagarkot?
- (a)Azizuddin Khan
- (b)Mulla Abdul Baqi
- (c)Mirza Muhammad Ali
- (d)Talib Amuli
Correct — A, Azizuddin Khan. After Firoz Shah Tughlaq's campaign against Nagarkot (Kangra), he took possession of a large collection of Sanskrit manuscripts from the Jwalamukhi temple library. He had a set of these works (on subjects such as astronomy, astrology and divination) rendered into Persian; the translation was carried out by Azizuddin Khan and the resulting Persian work was titled 'Dalail-i-Firozshahi'. Firoz Shah is remembered as the first Delhi Sultan to sponsor such Sanskrit-to-Persian translation.
- (b)Mulla Abdul Baqi — Associated with the later Mughal literary milieu, not with Firoz Shah Tughlaq's 14th-century Nagarkot translation.
- (c)Mirza Muhammad Ali — Not the scholar credited with translating the Nagarkot manuscripts under Firoz Shah Tughlaq.
- (d)Talib Amuli — A Persian poet of the Mughal era (poet-laureate under Jahangir), separated from Firoz Tughlaq by more than two centuries — unconnected to this translation.
Firoz Shah Tughlaq (r. 1351-1388) is noted for patronising the translation of Indian texts into Persian. From the temple library at Nagarkot (Kangra), captured during his campaign there, he obtained a hoard of Sanskrit manuscripts, part of which were translated into Persian as 'Dalail-i-Firozshahi' by Azizuddin Khan.
The answer turns on linking the translator's name to Firoz Tughlaq's Nagarkot episode. The distractors are figures of the later Mughal period, so the trap is to pick a familiar 'court scholar/poet' name without tying it to the correct dynasty and century. (Sources vary on whether the haul was about 300 or 1,300 volumes; the translator and the title are the fixed points.)
- Firoz Shah Tughlaq captured Nagarkot (Kangra) and seized Sanskrit manuscripts from the Jwalamukhi temple library.
- Azizuddin Khan translated a set of these works into Persian.
- The resulting Persian work was titled 'Dalail-i-Firozshahi'.
- Firoz Shah was the first Delhi Sultan to sponsor Sanskrit-to-Persian translation.

- Picking a well-known Mughal-era scholar/poet instead of the Tughlaq-period translator
- Getting the number of volumes fixed (300 vs 1,300) — sources differ; the translator/title is what matters
Both UPPSC and UPSC test 'who translated which text under which ruler' — lock the chain Firoz Tughlaq / Nagarkot / Azizuddin Khan / Dalail-i-Firozshahi.
"YogaVasistha" was translated into Persian by Nizamuddin Panipati during the reign of:
- (a) Akbar
- (b) Humayun
- (c) Shahjahan
- (d) Aurangzeb
Answer(a) Akbar — the Sanskrit 'Yogavasistha' was rendered into Persian as 'Jug-Bashisht' by Nizamuddin Panipati.
Same concept — Sanskrit-to-Persian translation of Indian texts and its translator/patron, here in the Mughal context.
- practice — not a real PYQ
The Sanskrit works collected by Firoz Shah Tughlaq at Nagarkot were translated into Persian under the title:
- (a)Razmnama
- (b)Dalail-i-Firozshahi
- (c)Tarikh-i-Firoz-Shahi
- (d)Futuhat-i-Firozshahi
Answer(b) Dalail-i-Firozshahi — the Persian translation of the Nagarkot manuscripts.
- practice — not a real PYQ
Firoz Shah Tughlaq is significant in the history of translation because he was:
- (a)The first Delhi Sultan to sponsor Sanskrit-to-Persian translation
- (b)The translator of the Mahabharata into Persian
- (c)The founder of Akbar's translation bureau
- (d)The author of the Ain-i-Akbari
Answer(a) The first Delhi Sultan to sponsor Sanskrit-to-Persian translation.