Which of these is the correct spelling of a logic term for contradictions?
- (a)Paraconsistent
- (b)Paraconssistent
- (c)Paraconsistint
- (d)Paraconsestent
Answer
Why
Correct — A. Split it: para + consistent. The prefix does not change how consistent is spelt.
Consistent is con + sist + ent: one s after con, an i in sist, and the ending -ent. Paraconsistent → option (a).
Why the others are wrong
- (b)Paraconssistent — Paraconssistent doubles the s after con. Consistent has a single s there: con-sist-ent.
- (c)Paraconsistint — Paraconsistint ends in -int. The adjective ending is -ent, as in consistent, persistent and insistent.
- (d)Paraconsestent — Paraconsestent puts e where the stem has i. The stem is sist, as in consist, insist and resist.
Concept
In classical logic a contradiction lets you derive any statement at all. This is the principle of explosion.
A paraconsistent logic rejects it. A contradiction can sit in the system without every statement following from it, which is why the question calls it a logic term for contradictions.
You do not need the logic to answer. The item tests whether you can see consistent inside the long word and spell it.
Key facts
- Paraconsistent = para + consistent.
- A logic is paraconsistent if a contradiction does not entail every conclusion.
- Explosion, or ex contradictione quodlibet: from a contradiction, anything follows.
- Consist, insist, persist and resist share the stem -sist-.
Study next
Common traps
- Doubling the s after con, as in conssistent
- Writing -int for the unstressed ending, which sounds much like -ent in speech
A spelling item that names a field and asks for its term is also keyed at 19 Sep 2025, 09:00, English Q.6 (a theory centered on utility and outcomes → Utilitarianism).
The idea of contradiction itself is tested at 14 Sep 2025, 12:30, English Q.6, where a statement that appears self-contradictory yet may be true is keyed Paradox.
Related PYQs
No directly related past PYQ was found.