If 8 # 2 = 65 and 7 # 3 = 55, then 6 # 5 = ?
- (a)35
- (b)44
- (c)58
- (d)69
Answer
Why
Correct — C.
Rule: a # b = a² + b² − 3.
8 # 2 = 64 + 4 − 3 = 65 ✓
7 # 3 = 49 + 9 − 3 = 55 ✓
6 # 5 = 36 + 25 − 3 = 58 → option (c).
Why the others are wrong
- (a)35 — 35 is below 6² alone (36). The rule adds 5² = 25 before taking off 3, and both examples land above the first number's square (65 > 64, 55 > 49).
- (b)44 — 44 is 17 below 6² + 5² = 61. The examples take exactly 3 off the sum of squares (68 → 65, 58 → 55), not 17.
- (d)69 — 69 is 8 above 6² + 5² = 61. The examples never add to the sum of squares. They take 3 off it.
Concept
Start with what the examples share: 8 + 2 and 7 + 3 both make 10, yet the results differ (65 and 55). So the rule cannot depend on the sum alone.
Squares separate the pairs: 8² + 2² = 68 and 7² + 3² = 58, each exactly 3 above its result. That fixed gap across both examples is the rule: a² + b² − 3.
Two examples can fit more than one rule. 10a − 15 also gives 65 and 55, but for 6 # 5 it gives 45, which is not an option. The sum-of-squares rule gives 58, which is.
Key facts
- Rule here: a² + b² − 3.
- When the example pairs share a sum (8 + 2 = 7 + 3 = 10), the rule must use more than the sum.
- 6² + 5² = 61, so the answer sits 3 below 61.
Study next
Common traps
- Fitting a rule to one example only: 8 # 2 = 65 is also 8² + 1, which gives 50 for 7 # 3, not 55
- Settling on a rule the options do not contain, such as 10a − 15 (45), instead of testing another
15 Sep 2025, 12:30, Reasoning Q.21 also has pairs with a shared sum (5 + 2 = 4 + 3 = 7): 5 * 2 = 35 and 4 * 3 = 28 fit a × (a + b), keyed 60 for 6 * 4.
Reasoning Q.5 of this shift fits a × b + (a − b): 3 @ 2 = 7, 6 @ 3 = 21, 8 @ 2 = 22, keyed 21 for 5 @ 4.
Related PYQs
No directly related past PYQ was found.