In a certain code language, ‘A + B’ means ‘A is the mother of B’; ‘A − B’ means ‘A is the brother of B’; ‘A × B’ means ‘A is the wife of B’ and ‘A ÷ B’ means ‘A is the father of B’. Based on the above, how is 4 related to 1 if ‘4 × 3 − 2 − 1’?
- (a)Sister
- (b)Brother’s wife
- (c)Father’s sister
- (d)Mother
Answer
Why
Correct — B. Substitute one symbol at a time, left to right.
Rule: 4 × 3 makes 4 the wife of 3.
3 − 2 makes 3 the brother of 2, and 2 − 1 makes 2 the brother of 1.
So 3, 2 and 1 are siblings and 3 is male, which makes 3 a brother of 1 as well.
4 married into that set of siblings, so 4 is 1's brother's wife — option (b).
Why the others are wrong
- (a)Sister — 4 enters the chain only through ×, the marriage symbol. A sister would need 4 to share a parent with 1, and nothing in '4 × 3 − 2 − 1' gives 4 a blood link to anyone.
- (c)Father’s sister — This needs 4 to be a sibling of 1's father, but the father symbol ÷ never appears in the string. 3 is a brother of 1, not a parent of 1.
- (d)Mother — The mother symbol + does not occur in '4 × 3 − 2 − 1' at all. 4 is attached to 3 by ×, which fixes her as a wife, never as a parent.
Concept
Symbol-relation items hand you four operators and a chain, and the whole task is patient left-to-right substitution.
Two habits decide the mark. First, let each symbol fix gender — wife makes 4 female, brother makes 3 and 2 male.
Second, treat sibling links as transitive: 3 is the brother of 2 and 2 is the brother of 1, so 3 is a brother of 1.
Only then read off what 4 is to 1, which here is a relation by marriage rather than by blood.
The chain never fixes 1's own gender, and it does not need to. Brother's wife is the same answer whether 1 is a man or a woman.
Key facts
- 'A × B' means A is the wife of B, so the left-hand person in a × is female.
- 'A − B' means A is the brother of B, so the left-hand person in a − is male.
- Sibling links chain: 3 brother of 2 and 2 brother of 1 makes 3 a brother of 1.
- A brother's wife is a sister-in-law, a relation created by marriage.
Study next
Common traps
- Reading the chain right to left, which attaches 4 to the wrong person.
- Assuming 1 is male because 2 and 3 are, when the chain never says so.
- Forgetting that only + and ÷ create a parent link, so a chain without them cannot produce a mother or a father.
SSC reuses this exact legend with the numbers changed.
10 Sep 2024, 16:00, Reasoning Q.2 asks how 5 is related to 3 in '5 − 2 × 4 ÷ 3', and 12 Sep 2024, 09:00, Reasoning Q.23 asks how 4 is related to 2 in a five-term chain. Learn the legend once and the work is only substitution.
Related PYQs
No directly related past PYQ was found.