A customer pays ₹975 in instalments. The payment is done each month ₹5 less than the previous month. If the first instalment is ₹100, how much time will be taken to pay the entire amount?
- (a)26 months
- (b)14 months
- (c)27 months
- (d)15 months
Answer
Why
Correct — D. The instalments fall by a fixed ₹5, so they are an arithmetic progression with a = ₹100 and d = −5.
Sₙ = n⁄2 [2a + (n − 1)d]
975 = n⁄2 [200 − 5(n − 1)]
1,950 = 205n − 5n²
n² − 41n + 390 = 0
(n − 15)(n − 26) = 0, so n = 15 or n = 26 — two positive whole roots, and the paper prints both.
Only 15 keeps every instalment a real payment: ₹100, ₹95, ₹90 … ₹30, and 15 × (100 + 30)⁄2 = ₹975 → option (d).
Why the others are wrong
- (a)26 months — 26 is the second root of the same quadratic, so algebra alone will not reject it. The schedule does: the 21st instalment is 100 − 5 × 20 = ₹0 and months 22 to 26 are negative, which is money handed back, not paid.
- (b)14 months — Fourteen instalments total 14⁄2 [200 + 13(−5)] = 7 × 135 = ₹945, which is ₹30 short. That ₹30 is exactly the 15th instalment.
- (c)27 months — Twenty-seven instalments come to ₹945, not ₹975. Sₙ is a quadratic symmetric about n = 20.5, and 14 + 27 = 41, so S₂₇ = S₁₄. By then the payments are long since negative.
Concept
A payment falling by a fixed amount each month is an arithmetic progression: here a = 100 and d = −5, so the nth instalment is ₹(105 − 5n).
The sum Sₙ = n⁄2 [2a + (n − 1)d] is a quadratic in n. A target total therefore has two roots, and when d is negative both can be positive whole numbers — S₁₅ and S₂₆ are both ₹975.
The algebra cannot choose between them. The situation does: an instalment is money paid, so a schedule cannot run past its last positive term, the ₹5 paid in month 20.
Sₙ = (205n − 5n²)⁄2 climbs to ₹1,050 by month 20, and the 21st instalment is ₹0, so nothing is added in month 21.
After that the terms turn negative and the running total falls back.
The total after n months equals the total after 41 − n months, so each total met on the way up is met again on the way down. Months 15 and 26 both give ₹975, and both sit in the options.
Key facts
- The instalments form an AP with a = ₹100 and d = −₹5, so the nth instalment is ₹(105 − 5n).
- Sₙ = n⁄2 [2a + (n − 1)d], which here reduces to Sₙ = (205n − 5n²)⁄2.
- n² − 41n + 390 = 0 factorises as (n − 15)(n − 26), so S₁₅ = S₂₆ = ₹975.
- The 21st instalment works out at ₹0 and every later one is negative, so a paying schedule cannot run past 20 months.
Study next
Common traps
- Solving the quadratic, spotting 26 among the options and stopping there.
- Reading "₹5 less than the previous month" as ₹5 less than the first month, which makes every instalment after the first ₹95.
- Writing Sₙ = n⁄2 [2a + nd] instead of (n − 1)d. The equation becomes n² − 40n + 390 = 0, whose roots, 20 ± √10, are not whole numbers.
Instalments are also asked at 10 Sep 2024, 12:30, Quant Q.19, though the mechanism there is simple interest on a debt of ₹26,160 discharged by equal yearly instalments, not a falling series.
Summing a progression is the hinge again at 24 Sep 2024, 16:00, Quant Q.1, which needs the sum of the first 12 natural numbers before any divisor can be tested.
Related PYQs
No directly related past PYQ was found.