A vendor started selling vegetables at ₹10 per kg, but couldn’t find buyers at this rate. So he reduced the price to ₹7.2 per kg, but uses a faulty weight of 900 g instead of 1 kg. Find the percentage change in the actual price.
- (a)10%
- (b)15%
- (c)25%
- (d)20%
Answer
Why
Correct — D. Compare both rates on a genuine kilogram.
Old rate = ₹10 per real kg
New rate = ₹7.2, but the buyer receives only 900 g
True new rate = 7.2 ⁄ 0.9 = ₹8 per real kg
Fall = 10 − 8 = ₹2, taken on the original ₹10
= 2 ⁄ 10 × 100 = 20% decrease → option (d)
Why the others are wrong
- (a)10% — 10% is the shortfall in the weight (100 g missing from every kilogram), not the change in price. The weight error feeds into the rate calculation, it is not the answer to it.
- (b)15% — No step here produces 15%. It sits between the two tempting wrong answers and survives only as a guess, since neither ₹7.2 nor ₹8 stands in a 15% relation to ₹10.
- (c)25% — 25% is the ₹2 fall divided by the new ₹8 instead of the original ₹10. Percentage change is always measured on the figure you started from.
Concept
Two separate things move in this sale: the quoted rate and the quantity actually handed over.
A vendor who bills 900 g as a kilogram is charging ₹7.2 for 0.9 kg. Restated per genuine kilogram, that is 7.2 ⁄ 0.9 = ₹8.
Convert both rates to the same real unit before comparing them. Only then does percentage change mean anything, and it is computed on the original value, ₹10.
'Actual price' in this question means the price of a real kilogram, not the ₹7.2 written on the board. That is the whole trick: the reduction looks like 28% and is really 20%.
Key facts
- A faulty 900 g weight means the true rate per kilogram is the quoted rate divided by 0.9.
- ₹7.2 charged for 900 g works out to ₹8 per genuine kilogram.
- Percentage change divides by the original value, so (10 − 8) ⁄ 10 = 20%.
Study next
Common traps
- Dividing the ₹2 fall by the new ₹8, which returns 25%.
- Ignoring the faulty weight and comparing ₹7.2 with ₹10 to get 28%.
- Treating the 100 g shortage as a 10% price effect.
SSC writes these as an honest-looking price cut with the cheating weight buried in the last clause, so the reader who stops at the two rupee figures is already wrong. Percentage arithmetic on a shifted base also drives Quant Q.14 and Q.17 in this shift.
Related PYQs
No directly related past PYQ was found.