Select the sentence that has a grammatical error.
- (a)Indian force are known for their loyalty and integrity.
- (b)It is said that Joseph was not ready to go to war.
- (c)It is impossible to wake Christine up in the morning.
- (d)Karl Marx was a renowned social scientist.
Answer
Why
Correct — A. The subject of option (a) is Indian force — singular in form and carrying no article — while the verb is are known, plural. Nothing in the sentence licenses that plural.
The repair the sentence itself asks for is the plural noun: Indian forces are known for their loyalty and integrity.
The giveaway is the possessive their later in the same sentence. The writer was thinking of a plural subject, so it is the noun that lost its -s.
Why the others are wrong
- (b)It is said that Joseph was not ready to go to war. — No error. It is said that plus a clause is the standard impersonal passive for reporting an unattributed claim, and the past tense was not ready sits correctly inside it.
- (c)It is impossible to wake Christine up in the morning. — No error. The anticipatory it stands in for the to-infinitive phrase, and wake Christine up is the ordinary separable order of the phrasal verb wake up.
- (d)Karl Marx was a renowned social scientist. — No error. The singular subject Karl Marx takes the singular past verb was, and a renowned is right because renowned begins with a consonant sound.
Concept
In this item the fault is planted in one word of one sentence, and it is most often agreement — a subject and a verb that disagree in number.
Read the subject first, then the verb. One care here: force is a collective noun, and British usage lets a collective take a plural verb when its members are meant individually — the jury are divided.
That licence does not rescue this sentence. The collective reading needs the article too — the Indian force — and what is printed carries neither the article nor the plural noun the verb is asking for.
The second clue is the pronoun. A later their, they or them tells you the number the writer intended, and which half of the mismatch to correct.
Both repairs are defensible in isolation — Indian forces are known, or The Indian force is known — but the sentence's own their makes the plural noun the natural correction. Either way the sentence the key marks is the same one.
Key facts
- In ordinary usage a singular subject takes a singular verb: force is, forces are.
- British usage allows a collective noun such as jury, staff or committee a plural verb when its members are meant individually.
- A pronoun later in the sentence often reveals the number the writer intended for the subject.
- The stem asks for the sentence containing an error, so the sentences you cannot fault are evidence you have found the right one, not a gap in your reading.
Study next
Common traps
- Correcting are known to is known, when the sentence's own their asks for the plural noun instead
- Suspecting the reporting passive because it reads formally, though it is a standard structure
- Hunting for a vocabulary or spelling mistake in an item that tests grammar only
The same agreement test also comes in segment form, where the sentence is split and you name the faulty segment rather than the faulty sentence — English Q.3 of this paper (17 Sep 2024, 12:30) is that version.
Related PYQs
No directly related past PYQ was found.