Select the most appropriate option that can substitute the underlined segment in the given sentence. Five years later, I was eating this same dish at the same restaurant.
- (a)had been eating
- (b)am eating
- (c)has been eating
- (d)will have be eating
Answer
Why
Correct — B. All four choices are forms of eat, so only the verb phrase was eating is in play.
Three fail on form or logic:
will have be eating is not an English form.
has been eating does not agree with I.
had been eating needs a later past point that the sentence never supplies.
That leaves am eating, the narrative present: a past scene told in the present tense to make it immediate.
Five years later, I am eating this same dish at the same restaurant → option (b).
Why the others are wrong
- (a)had been eating — The past perfect continuous needs a later past reference point to sit before, as in I had been eating there for years when it closed. This sentence supplies no such second past event, so the tense has nothing to anchor to.
- (c)has been eating — This fails on subject-verb agreement before meaning is even reached. The subject is I, which takes have been eating; has belongs to he, she or it.
- (d)will have be eating — Will have be eating is not a formed tense. The future perfect continuous is will have been eating, and be cannot follow have in this position.
Concept
The item is a two-stage test, and doing the stages in order is what makes it quick.
First check formation: is the option even a possible English verb form? That removes will have be eating at once. Then check agreement with the subject, which removes has been eating.
Only then weigh tense logic against the sentence, which is where had been eating fails for want of a second past reference. The survivor is the answer, and here the survivor is a narrative present.
There is no No substitution choice among the options on this question, so the task is not whether was eating is faulty on its own — it is to pick the only well-formed and sensible replacement offered. SSC does supply that choice on some substitution items, for instance 17 Sep 2024, 09:00, English Q.19.
Key facts
- The future perfect continuous is will have been eating, so will have be eating is not a possible form.
- The subject I takes have been eating, never has been eating.
- The past perfect continuous marks an action completed before another past point.
- The narrative or historic present tells a past event in the present tense to make it feel immediate.
Study next
Common traps
- Weighing the four options for meaning before checking whether each is even a well-formed tense.
- Rejecting am eating because the sentence opens with the past marker Five years later, when that combination is exactly what the narrative present does.
In a verb-substitution item it is the time expression in the sentence that settles the tense. Also asked 18 Sep 2024, 09:00, English Q.15, where is working for the past 22 years becomes has been working, and 10 Sep 2024, 09:00, English Q.6, where since I am born becomes since I was born.
Related PYQs
No directly related past PYQ was found.