Which of the following programmes have been supported by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) along with Government of India for poverty reduction and livelihoods promotion ?
(a) Affordable Rur

Question

Which of the following programmes have been supported by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) along with Government of India for poverty reduction and livelihoods promotion ?
(a) Affordable Rural Housing for All
(b) Improving Efficiency of Health Care System in Multiple States (2013 – 2017)
(c) Governance and Accelerated Livelihoods Support (GOALS) (2013 – 2017)
(d) Strengthening National Capacities in Tribal Areas (2013 – 2017)

UnlockIAS · Accepted Answer

Correct — option (4), All of the above. The Commission's key treats every one of the four programmes named in statements (a) to (d) as one that the United Nations Development Programme has supported alongside the Government of India for poverty reduction and the promotion of livelihoods, so the only option that admits all four is the answer. The detail on the page that explains why they belong together is the date range: statements (b), (c) and (d) each carry the years 2013 to 2017, and that is not a coincidence but the length of a UNDP country programme cycle. UNDP does not run projects in a country at random. Its work is organised into five-year country programmes, each set out in a Country Programme Document approved by the UNDP Executive Board and then given effect through a Country Programme Action Plan signed with the host government; the cycle covering these years was approved by the Executive Board in September 2012 and ran from 2013 to 2017, and it sat inside the wider United Nations Development Action Framework for India for the same period, which was drawn up with the Planning Commission and deliberately harmonised with the Twelfth Five Year Plan. Everything the United Nations system did in India in those years was meant to fit that framework's outcomes, which covered inclusive growth, food and nutrition security, gender equality, access to basic services, decentralisation and sustainable development. Read against that background, the four items in the list stop looking like an arbitrary collection and start looking like what they are: entries from one programme cycle, each attached to a different outcome — shelter, health system efficiency, governance and livelihoods, and the specific position of tribal communities. It is worth being clear about what UNDP's support means, because candidates routinely overstate it. UNDP is not a lender and does not finance national programmes in the way a development bank does; it works as a technical and advisory partner with central ministries, state governments and civil society organisations, contributing project design, pilot implementation, capacity building, monitoring systems and evidence, with delivery remaining the government's. Its presence in India is long-standing, going back to 1951, and its tribal work in this period included grassroots capacity building and support to the recognition of forest rights titles for forest-dwelling communities. The question is fundamentally one of recall from that programme list, and every printed item is on it, which makes option (4) the answer.

Why the other options are wrong — (a) This option accepts only statement (a) and rejects the other three. It is the least defensible of the wrong options, because statements (c) and (d) name programmes whose very titles — Governance and Accelerated Livelihoods Support, and Strengthening National Capacities in Tribal Areas — describe governance and livelihood work of exactly the kind the stem asks about, and both carry the 2013 to 2017 range that identifies the country programme cycle. Choosing this option amounts to deciding that a single unfamiliar title is the whole answer, which is what a candidate does when the reading has stopped at the first statement. In a list question the discipline is to evaluate every statement before looking at the options at all, since an option can only be chosen once each statement has been marked in or out on its own.  (b) This option accepts (a), (b) and (c) and drops only the tribal areas programme at (d). There is no basis for singling that one out. Work with tribal communities is among the most visible parts of UNDP's engagement in India during this period, and it is squarely within the stem's subject, since the promotion of livelihoods among Scheduled Tribes is a poverty reduction objective in the most direct sense. A candidate is sometimes tempted to drop the last item in a list simply because three items feel like a natural answer and four feels like a trap, but a three-item option is not safer than a four-item one; it is only different, and it is wrong whenever the statement it excludes is true.  (c) This option accepts (b), (c) and (d) and drops the rural housing programme at (a), and it is the most tempting of the three because the printed page invites it. Statement (a) is the only one of the four that carries no date range, which makes it look typographically different from its neighbours, and a reader who has noticed that the other three share the years 2013 to 2017 may conclude that the odd one out does not belong. That is an inference about the printing rather than about the facts. The absence of a date on one entry of a list is not evidence that the entry is false, and the key treats all four as supported programmes. It is a useful habit to notice such asymmetries, because they often show where an examiner has laid a trap, but the trap here is the temptation to exclude rather than the item excluded.

Concept: The United Nations Development Programme is the development arm of the United Nations system and has had a presence in India since 1951. Its role is easily misunderstood, and understanding it correctly answers a large family of examination questions at once. UNDP is not a bank: it does not lend, and its financial contribution to a country the size of India is small beside the government's own spending. What it supplies is technical and advisory — designing and piloting interventions, building the capacity of officials and community institutions, setting up monitoring and evaluation systems, generating evidence, and connecting Indian practice to experience elsewhere — while the delivery of any programme at scale remains with central ministries, state governments and, increasingly, civil society organisations. The work is organised in cycles. For each country a Country Programme Document is prepared and approved by the UNDP Executive Board, and a Country Programme Action Plan is then signed with the host government to give it effect; the cycle relevant to this question was approved in September 2012 and ran from 2013 to 2017, with a successor cycle covering 2018 to 2022. Above the individual agency sits the United Nations Development Action Framework, which is the single plan shared by every United Nations entity working in the country; the Indian framework for 2013 to 2017 was drawn up with the Planning Commission and aligned to the Twelfth Five Year Plan, setting out six outcomes on inclusive growth, food and nutrition security, gender equality, access to quality basic services, decentralisation and sustainable development. Individual projects — on housing, on the efficiency of health systems, on governance and livelihoods, on tribal capacities — are the operational expression of those outcomes, which is why they share a start and end year.

State PCS 2022 Q24 — Economy PYQ with Answer

State PCS 2022 Q24 — Economy PYQ with Answer