How much has the per capita income of Madhya Pradesh, at current prices, increased from financial year 2011-12 to financial year 2023-24?
- (a)Doubled
- (b)Nearly tripled
- (c)Nearly four-fold
- (d)No significant change
Correct — C, Nearly four-fold. On the state Economic Survey's figures, Madhya Pradesh's per capita income at current prices was about ₹38,500 in 2011-12 and had reached roughly ₹1.4 lakh by 2023-24 (an advance estimate). That is a rise of about 3.6 to 3.7 times over twelve years — already well past three times, and close enough to four that 'nearly four-fold' is the option the commission's key records as correct.
- (a)Doubled — Far too low. A doubling would put 2023-24 at roughly ₹77,000; the actual current-price figure is close to twice that again.
- (b)Nearly tripled — The trap option. Tripling would mean about ₹1.15 lakh, which the state crossed before 2023-24 — the multiple has already gone past three, so 'nearly tripled' understates it and 'nearly four-fold' is the closer description.
- (d)No significant change — Plainly wrong on the data. Even ignoring real growth, twelve years of price rise alone would have lifted a nominal (current-price) figure substantially.
Per capita income of a state is its Net State Domestic Product divided by the projected mid-year population, so it moves with both output and population. It is published two ways. At current prices (nominal) the figure includes the effect of price rise; at constant prices — the present series uses 2011-12 as base year — the price effect is stripped out, so it shows real change. A nominal multiple of about 3.6 over twelve years therefore corresponds to a much smaller rise in real purchasing power.
The question is deliberately framed 'at current prices', which is the exam's way of telling you to expect the larger, inflation-inclusive number. Two habits help here. First, read the price basis before reading the options — the same state over the same years looks very different at constant prices. Second, keep the level and the rank apart: a fast rise in MP's per capita income does not by itself mean the state has overtaken the national average, and MPPSC has asked that comparison separately.
- MP per capita income at current prices: about ₹38,497 in 2011-12, rising to roughly ₹1.4 lakh in 2023-24 (state Economic Survey; the later figure is an advance estimate)
- That works out to a rise of roughly 3.6 to 3.7 times — the basis for the answer 'nearly four-fold'
- Per capita income = Net State Domestic Product ÷ projected mid-year population
- Current prices include inflation; constant (2011-12) prices remove it, so real growth is much smaller than the nominal multiple
- 2011-12 is the base year of the current series of national and state accounts
Nominal growth always looks larger than real growth. The stem's phrase 'at current prices' is the signal to use the inflation-inclusive figure.
- Ignoring the words 'at current prices' and reasoning with real growth rates instead
- Reading a fast rise in per capita income as proof that the state has crossed the national average
- Forgetting that per capita income falls if population grows faster than income, even when total output rises
MPPSC asks it as a state-economy data point drawn from the MP Economic Survey — either the multiple, as here, or MP's standing against the all-India figure. UPSC almost never asks a state's number; it tests the concept behind it, especially the current-price versus constant-price distinction.
The growth rate of per capita income at current prices is higher than that of per capita income at constant prices, because the latter takes into account the rate of
- (a) growth of population
- (b) increase in price level
- (c) growth of money supply
- (d) increase in the wage rate
Answer(b) increase in price level
The exact concept the MPPSC stem rests on — why a per capita income figure at current prices grows so much faster than the same figure at constant prices.
In the year 2022-23, on comparing the per capita income of Madhya Pradesh and that of India on the basis of advanced estimates at constant (2011-12) prices, we find that:
- (a) Per capita income of Madhya Pradesh is higher than that of India
- (b) Per capita income of Madhya Pradesh is lower than that of India
- (c) Per capita income of Madhya Pradesh is equal to that of India
- (d) Comparison is not possible
Answer(b) Per capita income of Madhya Pradesh is lower than that of India
The same data block one year earlier, taken from the other side — MP's per capita income measured against the all-India figure, and at constant prices rather than current.
- practice — not a real PYQ
The per capita income of a state is calculated as:
- (a)Gross State Domestic Product ÷ number of households
- (b)Net State Domestic Product ÷ projected mid-year population
- (c)Total tax revenue ÷ population
- (d)State budget expenditure ÷ population
Answer(b) Net State Domestic Product ÷ projected mid-year population.
- practice — not a real PYQ
The base year of the current series of India's national and state accounts (GDP/GSDP at constant prices) is:
- (a)2004-05
- (b)2009-10
- (c)2011-12
- (d)2014-15
Answer(c) 2011-12 — which is also why this question uses 2011-12 as its starting point.