The 91st Amendment of the Indian Constitution provides
- (a)ceiling of the size of Council of Ministers
- (b)no enhancement of seats of Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha till 2026
- (c)bifurcation of the National Commission of SCs and STs
- (d)None of the above
Correct — A, ceiling on the size of the Council of Ministers. The Constitution (91st Amendment) Act, 2003 inserted Articles 75(1A) and 164(1A), capping the total strength of the Council of Ministers — at the Centre and in every State — at 15% of the total membership of the Lok Sabha/Legislative Assembly.
- (b)no enhancement of seats of Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha till 2026 — That is the delimitation-freeze provision — enacted by the 84th Amendment (2001), which extended the 1971-census-based seat count until the first census after 2026 — a different amendment.
- (c)bifurcation of the National Commission of SCs and STs — The National Commission for SCs & STs was split into separate Article 338 (NCSC) and Article 338A (NCST) bodies by the 89th Amendment (2003), not the 91st.
- (d)None of the above — Incorrect — option (a) correctly states the 91st Amendment's central provision.
The Constitution (91st Amendment) Act, 2003 did two main things: it capped the size of the Council of Ministers — Union and State — at 15% of the strength of the Lok Sabha/Assembly (Articles 75(1A) and 164(1A)), and it tightened the anti-defection law by removing the old one-third 'split' exemption (only two-thirds mergers are now protected) and barring disqualified members from holding ministerial or other remunerative political posts.
MPPSC likes to test amendment-number recall by mixing genuinely-91st provisions with provisions from neighbouring amendments (89th, 84th) that sound equally plausible but belong elsewhere.
- 91st Amendment (2003): Council of Ministers capped at 15% of House strength (Art 75(1A)/164(1A)).
- 91st Amendment also tightened the anti-defection law (10th Schedule) — removed the 1/3 'split' exemption.
- 89th Amendment (2003) split the combined SC/ST Commission into NCSC (Art 338) and NCST (Art 338A) — a different amendment.
- 84th Amendment (2001) froze the seat-count basis (1971 census) until the first census after 2026 — also a different amendment.
Each amendment did a different, specific thing — don't mix them up.
- Mixing up which amendment did what among 84th/89th/91st/93rd
- Assuming the ceiling on Council of Ministers size applies only at the Centre — it applies to States too, via Article 164(1A)
'Which amendment provides X' direct-recall MCQs are common; sometimes framed as Assertion-Reason or match-the-list questions across several amendments.
Which of the Constitution Amendment Acts seeks that the size of the Council of Ministers at the Centre and in a State must not exceed 15 percent of the total number in the Lok Sabha and the total number of members of the Legislative Assembly of that State, respectively?
- (a) 91st
- (b) 93rd
- (c) 95th
- (d) 97th
Answer(a) 91st Amendment.
Direct UPSC 2007 prelims question on the exact same fact — the 91st Amendment's 15% ceiling on Council of Ministers size.
- practice — not a real PYQ
Which Constitutional Amendment Act split the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes into two separate commissions?
- (a)89th
- (b)91st
- (c)93rd
- (d)97th
Answer(a) 89th Amendment (2003) — created separate NCSC (Art 338) and NCST (Art 338A).
- practice — not a real PYQ
As per the 91st Amendment, the total strength of a State's Council of Ministers, including the Chief Minister, shall not exceed what percentage of the total membership of that State's Legislative Assembly?
- (a)10%
- (b)15%
- (c)20%
- (d)25%
Answer(b) 15%.