1.Tribunal Reforms in India (Tribunal Reforms)
What & Where
Definition: Statutory quasi-judicial bodies resolving specialised disputes outside regular courts across India
Constitutional basis: Part XIV-A; Articles 323-A (service tribunals) & 323-B (other matters); inserted by 42nd Amendment 1976
Core process: Appeals lie to High Courts/Supreme Court; SC urges creation of National Tribunals Commission for appointments
Quick Facts for MCQs
Judiciary Oversight
- Basic-structure: High Court & SC review cannot be ousted, L. Chandra Kumar 1997
- Tenure: Four-year term held arbitrary, violates independence, SC 2025
- Composition: Technical members not to outnumber judicial members, R. Gandhi 2010
Governance Concerns
- Executive-control: Government dominates appointments, service terms, removal, hurting separation of powers
- Vacancies: Persistent non-filling forces SC to grant ad-hoc extensions to avert tribunal paralysis
- Quality: Outsourced, poorly reasoned orders inflate SC correction workload and delay justice
Reform Measures
- NTC: Independent body for selection, evaluation, finance of all tribunals repeatedly directed by Supreme Court
- Funding: Budgets to be charged on Consolidated Fund ensuring autonomy, uniform infrastructure, regional benches
- Digitisation: Electronic case management proposed to expedite massive commercial and service dispute backlogs
Key Data Points
| Feature | Data-Point |
|---|---|
| 42nd Amendment year | 1976 |
| Armed Forces Tribunal pendency | ~38,000 cases |
| Commercial tribunal backlog | 3.56 lakh cases |
| Economic value of backlog | ₹24.7 lakh crore (≈7.5 % GDP) |
| HC jurisdiction restored by | L. Chandra Kumar 1997 |
| Technical≯Judicial rule set in | R. Gandhi 2010 |
| 4-yr tenure struck down | Madras Bar Association 2025 |
| SC-suggested retirement age | 67 years |
Related UPSC Prelims PYQs
Consider the following statements :
Which one of the following suggested that the Governor should be an eminent person from outside the State and should be a detached figure without intense political links or should not have taken part in politics in the recent past?
