Discuss the recent measures initiated in disaster management by the Government of India departing from the earlier reactive approach.

Key learnings from their answer

• ›Every single answer opens with a quantified hook that frames the scale before any argument begins, '85% of geography vulnerable', '12% flood-prone', '7576 km coast', '40% of global cyclones occur at the Indian coast'. -> Don't start a GS3 answer with a definition; open with one hard statistic that quantifies the problem's magnitude, so the examiner sees you grasp the scale in the first line.
• ›Solutions are consistently anchored to named frameworks and committees instead of vague suggestions, Sendai, Hyogo and Yokohama frameworks, 2nd ARC recommendations, and the Gadgil & Kasturirangan committees on the Western Ghats. -> Tie every 'way forward' to a specific report or framework by name; it signals you know the actual policy architecture rather than improvising remedies.
• ›Value-addition is built in without padding, a 'RESILIENT' mnemonic to structure the 2nd ARC capacity-building answer (Q6) and a 'glocalization' framing (with CBDR, WHO, adaptation-mitigation) to critically examine localizing global DRR frameworks (Q7). -> One memorable coined term or acronym per high-mark answer gives the examiner a hook to remember your script by; deploy it sparingly on the 15-markers, not everywhere.