View answer copy →Answered a very similar question
Their question: “Left Wing Extremism / Maoism and its link to development; government steps”
Anudeep's Q14 links Maoism to the development deficit with a Red Corridor map and PESA/FRA/SAMADHAN measures, precisely 2020 Q16's determinants-and-strategy demand.
Key learnings from their answer
- ›He draws clean labelled India maps to localise the issue, the Maoist 'Red Corridor' marking Bastar, Gadchiroli and Nallamala hills (Q14), solar-irradiance zones with a very-high/high/moderate/low legend (Q6), neighbour-wise security threats (Q13), and dedicated freight corridors WDFC/EDFC (Q15). -> For any spatially-rooted GS3 topic (internal security, energy, infrastructure, environment), a small labelled map with named locations adds value-content a paragraph can't, and shows real subject knowledge.
- ›He names committees, acts and landmark cases with precision instead of generalities, Ashok Dalwai committee and 'double farm income by 2022-23' (Q1/Q16), Xaxa committee and the Vedanta/Dongria Kondh case alongside PESA, FRA, SAMADHAN and UAPA (Q14). -> Build a stock of the exact committee/act/case attached to each GS3 theme and deploy it as evidence; specific institutional references demonstrate you've engaged the syllabus, not just opinions.
Quotes used: “Maoism described as the 'gravest threat' to internal security — attributed to former PM (Manmohan) Singh (Q14)”