“Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution is a limited power and it cannot be enlarged into absolute power.” In the light of this statement explain whether Parliament under Article 368 of the Constitution can destroy the Basic Structure of the Constitution by expanding its amending power?

Key learnings from their answer

• ›Utkarsh matches a precisely-chosen case to each question's demand rather than scattering generic cases, Indra Sawhney (50% ceiling) for the 103rd Amendment/EWS question (Q7), S.R. Bommai safeguards for President's Rule under Art 356 (Q3), and I.R. Coelho (9th Schedule subject to judicial review) for Basic Structure (Q8). -> Curate 1-2 directly on-point judgments per question instead of a generic case dump; the relevance of the citation, not the count, is what signals command.
• ›On the Basic Structure 'North Star' question (Q8) he builds a chronological doctrinal arc, Golak Nath (1967) -> Kesavananda Bharati (1973, doctrine propounded) -> Minerva Mills (limited amending power) -> NJAC (judicial independence). -> For doctrine/evolution questions, sequence your cases as a timeline that shows the principle developing, which reads as analysis rather than a list of names.