View answer copy →Answered a very similar question
Their question: “WTO crisis of relevance — challenges & revival measures in a multipolar world (full attempt, with concept diagram)”
The topper's full attempt on WTO's paralysis (blocked Appellate Body, stalled Doha) and revival measures directly answers the 2018 PYQ on what reforms the WTO needs to survive the trade-war era, with India's interest in view.
Key learnings from their answer
- ›Topic-matched authority quote as the closing line on EVERY answer, Modi's 'Blood and water can't flow together' to seal the IWT answer (Q3), 'This is not an era of war' on the Iran-Israel balancing answer (Q8), Xi's 'Dragon-Elephant Tango' and Jaishankar's 'stable, but not normal and remain sensitive' on India-China (Q10), and Pascal Lamy on WTO reform (Q9). The quote is never generic, it is the specific figure on that specific issue. -> Bank 1-2 issue-specific quotes per hot topic (PM/EAM/relevant thinker) and use them to land the conclusion, not as decoration.
- ›Data-carrying diagrams, not decorative ones: the Q6 BRICS pie (46% population) and bar (GDP rising 24%->30%) and the Q10 line/bar showing the India-China trade deficit widening (~$65bn in 2020 to ~$101bn in 2024) each visualise the exact statistic the argument turns on; the Q9 'WTO: cornerstone of trade' concept box maps four functions (tariff reduction, globalisation, MFN, non-discrimination). -> Make diagrams encode your key numbers or your structural points, so the visual does analytical work instead of filling space.
What they cited: WTO: formed post Uruguay Round (1995/1996); MFN & non-discrimination principles; US reciprocal tariff & aluminium-tariff violation; US blocking Appellate Body appointments; Public Stockholding issue; Agreement on Agriculture; EU CBAM; Doha Development Agenda; Pascal Lamy (ex-WTO DG)
Quotes used: “WTO needs to evolve and reform itself to stay relevant in changing times — Pascal Lamy, ex-WTO DG (Q9)”