Two parallel run schemes of the Government, viz. the Adhaar Card and NPR, one as voluntary and the other as compulsory, have led to debates at national levels and also litigations. On merits, discuss whether or not both schemes need run concurrently. Analyse the potential of the schemes to achieve developmental benefits and equitable growth.

Key learnings from their answer

• ›Anudeep opens nearly every answer by naming the exact Constitutional provision the question hinges on before defining anything, Art 312 for the civil-services question (Q9), Art 153 for the Governor (Q11), Art 324 for the Election Commission (Q13), Art 47 for health (Q8). -> Lead your GS2 answer with the precise Article, not a vague intro: it instantly signals constitutional literacy and frames the whole answer in the examiner's first 10 seconds.
• ›Claims are pinned to named reports with hard numbers, not adjectives: DAKSH on 12-15 year adjudication delays (Q7), Lancet on 0.7 doctors per 1000 vs WHO's 2 and 1.5%-of-GDP health spend vs Thailand's 3.5% (Q8), ADR's 33% of MPs with criminal antecedents (Q2/Q13), World Bank's Rs 80,000 cr Aadhaar saving (Q4). -> Memorise 2-3 source-attributed statistics per static topic; 'DAKSH report' or 'per Lancet' is far more convincing than 'huge delays' and is what separates a 6 from a 10.