View answer copy →Answered a closely related question
Their question: “'Partition was a necessary evil' — analyse (15m/250w)”
Her partition answer (Divide-and-Rule, Two-Nation Theory, Cripps/Wavell/August Offer negotiations) directly feeds this PYQ on how British imperial power complicated the transfer of power in the 1940s.
Key learnings from their answer
- ›She opens almost every answer with a one-line definition of the keyword before arguing ('Foreign policy can be defined as...', 'Globalisation can be defined as...', 'Communalism can be defined as...', 'Paintings are a very crucial source of history...') -> build one reusable definition-led intro template so you settle the demand and start the body in seconds instead of burning time hunting for an opening.
- ›She closes with a fixed sign-off formula, every conclusion starts 'Thus...' and lands a balanced one-liner like 'double-edged sword' or 'need for judicious use of water' -> keep a tight, pre-set conclusion stub so you never trail off mid-thought when time runs short.
What they cited: Q12: 15 Aug 1947; Revolt of 1857; Divide & Rule; Two-Nation Theory; Quit India Movement & WWII; August Offer, Cripps Mission, Wavell Plan; C. Rajagopalachari formula, Desai-Liaquat Pact; opposed by Maulana Azad, Gandhi, Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan
Quotes used: “Q12: '...We will let them have Pakistan, instead of having unrest for years to come' — written by the candidate (in quotes) as the view of leaders like Rajagopalachari & Nehru; it is her paraphrase rather than a sourced verbatim quotation”