View answer copy →Rishabh BhattRank 363CSE 2023
Answered a very similar question
Their question: “Reasons behind regional sentiments & cultural assertiveness; link to separatism (15 marks)”
Directly addresses regionalism as a product of rising cultural assertiveness and its slide toward separatism, the PYQ's exact proposition.
Key learnings from their answer
- ›Almost every sub-point is anchored with a concrete 'eg ->' rather than a generic claim: Q2 names Faraizi, Eka, Indigo, Tebhaga, Pagalpanthis and Mappila movements instead of just saying 'peasant movements'; Q5 cites Joshimath's NTPC tunnel; Q15 cites the Reasi (J&K) lithium reserve and the South American 'lithium triangle'. -> Don't state a point and move on; immediately bolt a specific named instance onto it so the examiner sees you actually know the topic, not just the template.
- ›He answers in the question's own direction-words as boxed/underlined sub-headings: Q2 splits into 'Similarities/Differences' (because the demand was 'compare & contrast'), and CSP-type answers run 'Causes/Consequences/Solutions'. -> Lift the directive verb from the question (compare, examine, causes-and-measures) and turn it into your literal headings, so the structure visibly mirrors the demand and you can't drift off-question.