In the context of accounting, the term IFRS stands for
- (a)International Financial Reporting Standards
- (b)Indian Financial Reporting Standards
- (c)Indian Financial Reporting System
- (d)International Financial Reporting System
Answer
Why
Correct — A, (a) International Financial Reporting Standards. Both halves of the expansion carry information, and the option set is built so that a candidate has to get both right: the four options are the four combinations of International or Indian with Standards or System, each differing from its neighbour by a single word.
'International' is the point of the whole project. Financial statements are read by people who did not prepare them — lenders, investors, regulators, acquirers — and until the late twentieth century a company's accounts could only be read against the rules of its own country, so a profit figure from one jurisdiction could not be compared with a profit figure from another. IFRS exist to remove that obstacle by giving the world one body of reporting rules, so that capital can cross borders without each investor having to learn a new accounting system.
'Standards' is the other half, and it is the word the fourth option changes. A standard is a rule with which an entity must comply and against which its financial statements can be audited and enforced; a system would be a set of procedures for doing the work. IFRS is a body of standards issued by a standard-setter, and the final S in the acronym is a plural — it names a set of individual standards, each dealing with a subject, not one integrated apparatus.
The institutions behind the acronym are worth holding. The standards are issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, which was constituted in 2001 under the IFRS Foundation and took over from the International Accounting Standards Committee that had operated from 1973. Standards issued by the older body were called International Accounting Standards, and those still in force keep that name; standards issued since 2001 are called IFRS. That is why an accountant will refer in one breath to IAS 2 and IFRS 15 — the numbering series are different vintages of the same body of rules.
India's position is convergence rather than adoption, and the distinction matters. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs notified the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules in 2015, setting out a phased roadmap: the Indian Accounting Standards, known as Ind AS, applied from the financial year 2016-17 to companies with a net worth of five hundred crore rupees or more, and from 2017-18 to listed companies and others with a net worth of two hundred and fifty crore rupees or more, with separate roadmaps for banks, non-banking financial companies and insurers. Ind AS are IFRS-converged, with departures written in to fit Indian law and conditions, so a company complying with Ind AS is not thereby stating compliance with IFRS.
Why the others are wrong
- (b)Indian Financial Reporting Standards — There is no body of rules called the Indian Financial Reporting Standards. India's standards carry two names and neither is this one: the older standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and notified by the Central Government are simply the Accounting Standards, cited as AS 1, AS 2 and so on, and the IFRS-converged set notified in 2015 are the Indian Accounting Standards, cited as Ind AS 1, Ind AS 115 and so on. The option is built by changing only the first word of the correct answer, which is why it survives a careless reading — the candidate recognises 'Financial Reporting Standards' as familiar and stops there.
- (c)Indian Financial Reporting System — This option is wrong on both of the dimensions the option set is testing. It makes the standards national rather than international, and it calls them a system rather than a set of standards. It is the option a candidate marks by recognising none of the words and choosing on the basis of which phrase sounds most like a piece of Indian official vocabulary. Eliminating it takes only the observation that the acronym's expansion must begin with a word starting with I and end with a word starting with S, and that both halves have to be right.
- (d)International Financial Reporting System — This gets the geography right and the last word wrong, which makes it the most dangerous of the three. 'System' and 'Standards' are not interchangeable in this context. A standard is an authoritative rule that an entity is required to apply and that an auditor can test compliance against; the plural in the acronym reflects that IFRS is a numbered series of such rules, each dealing with a defined subject — leases, revenue from contracts with customers, financial instruments and so on. Calling it a system would suggest an integrated method of processing accounts rather than a body of reporting requirements. When a stem asks what an acronym stands for and two options differ by one word, that word is where the question actually lies.
Concept
International Financial Reporting Standards are a single body of accounting standards intended for use across jurisdictions, so that financial statements prepared in one country can be read and compared by users in another. They are issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, constituted in 2001 under the IFRS Foundation, which succeeded the International Accounting Standards Committee that had issued International Accounting Standards from 1973; IAS still in force retain their old name and numbering, while new standards are issued as IFRS. Countries have responded in three ways: full adoption, under which IFRS as issued are the law; convergence, under which national standards are aligned with IFRS but retain deliberate departures; and retention of a purely national framework. India chose convergence. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs notified the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules in 2015, and the Indian Accounting Standards, Ind AS, were applied in phases — from the financial year 2016-17 for companies with a net worth of five hundred crore rupees or more, and from 2017-18 for listed companies and others with a net worth of two hundred and fifty crore rupees or more, with separate roadmaps for banks, non-banking financial companies and insurers. Because Ind AS carry carve-outs from IFRS, compliance with Ind AS is not a statement of compliance with IFRS. Alongside them the older Accounting Standards, AS 1 to AS 29, continue to apply to companies outside the Ind AS roadmap, which is why an Indian accountant works with two frameworks at once and why examination questions must always be read for which framework they are set in.
This is the easiest question in the paper's accountancy block and it is placed at the end of that run, but it is not free. The Commission has written the option set as a two-by-two grid — International or Indian, Standards or System — so that a candidate who half-remembers the acronym has a one-in-four chance rather than a certainty. The technique for any acronym item built this way is to decide each word separately instead of scanning for the phrase that looks most familiar. That habit generalises to a large family of EPFO items, since acronym expansion is a standing feature of both the general-awareness and the accountancy sections.
Key facts
- IFRS stands for International Financial Reporting Standards.
- They are issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, constituted in 2001 under the IFRS Foundation.
- The IASB succeeded the International Accounting Standards Committee, which issued International Accounting Standards from 1973.
- IAS still in force retain their original name and numbering; standards issued since 2001 are numbered as IFRS.
- The purpose is comparability of financial statements across countries, so that capital can move without each user learning a new national framework.
- India converged rather than adopted: the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules were notified in 2015.
- The converged standards are the Indian Accounting Standards, cited as Ind AS.
- Ind AS applied from the financial year 2016-17 to companies with a net worth of five hundred crore rupees or more.
- They applied from 2017-18 to listed companies and others with a net worth of two hundred and fifty crore rupees or more, with separate roadmaps for banks, NBFCs and insurers.
- Because Ind AS contain deliberate departures from IFRS, compliance with Ind AS is not a statement of compliance with IFRS.
- The older Accounting Standards, AS 1 to AS 29, continue to apply to companies outside the Ind AS roadmap.
Study next
Common traps
- Reading only the first word or only the last word of an expansion when the option set varies both.
- Assuming India adopted IFRS; India converged, and the converged standards are called Indian Accounting Standards.
- Inventing a name — there is no set of standards called the Indian Financial Reporting Standards.
- Treating IFRS as a single integrated system rather than a numbered series of individual standards.
- Confusing IAS with Ind AS — the first is the older international series, the second the Indian converged series.
Acronym expansion is a recurring EPFO shape in both the accountancy and the general-awareness sections, and the examiner's standard construction is a grid of options that vary one word at a time. Beyond the expansion, the accountancy block tests the standards themselves — what AS 1 treats as a fundamental assumption, what AS 2 includes in the cost of inventory, when AS 9 recognises revenue — so a candidate should hold both the name of the framework and the content of the two or three standards most often asked.
Related PYQs
EPFO_APFC_2023_Q42According to the Accounting Standard–1, which of the following are the fundamental accounting assumptions?
- (a) Going Concern, Consistency, Accrual
- (b) Going Concern, Money Measurement, Conservatism
- (c) Going Concern, Consistency, Conservatism
- (d) Going Concern, Accounting Period, Accrual
Answer(a) Going Concern, Consistency, Accrual
The Indian framework this one converged with, asked on the 2023 APFC paper — the fundamental accounting assumptions laid down by AS 1.
EPFO_EOAO_2023_Q76Which of the following is included in the ‘Cost of Inventory’ according to Accounting Standard-2 (Inventory Valuation) :
- (a) Administrative overheads that do not contribute to bringing the inventories to their present location and condition
- (b) Storage costs which are necessary in the production process prior to a further production stage
- (c) Selling and distribution costs
- (d) Duties and taxes paid on purchases, subsequently recoverable by the enterprise from the Tax Authorities
Answer(b) Storage costs which are necessary in the production process prior to a further production stage
A standard tested on its content rather than its name, on the 2023 EO/AO paper — what AS 2 includes in the cost of inventory.
Practice
- practice — not a real PYQ
International Financial Reporting Standards are issued by
- (a)the International Monetary Fund
- (b)the International Accounting Standards Board
- (c)the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
- (d)the Securities and Exchange Board of India
Answer(b) the International Accounting Standards Board
- practice — not a real PYQ
In India, the accounting standards converged with IFRS are known as
- (a)IFRS-India
- (b)Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS)
- (c)Indian Financial Reporting Standards
- (d)Generally Accepted Accounting Principles of India
Answer(b) Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS)