View answer copy →Anudeep DurishettyAIR 1CSE 2017
Answered a very similar question
Their question: “History of land reforms in India and whether they achieved their purpose”
Anudeep's Q17 weighs whether land reforms achieved their purpose in a for-vs-against structure, directly 2016 Q9's 'role of land reforms and factors for their success.'
Key learnings from their answer
- ›For every 'comment' / 'critically examine' question he splits the page into a two-column for-vs-against table, MPC violates vs does not violate RBI independence (Q3b), DBT beneficial vs harmful (Q18), growth challenge vs emissions challenge (Q4), land reforms positives vs negatives (Q17). -> When the directive demands balance, physically structure the answer as two columns/sides rather than a paragraph; it forces a genuinely two-sided treatment and is instantly visible to the examiner.
- ›He names committees, acts and landmark cases with precision instead of generalities, Ashok Dalwai committee and 'double farm income by 2022-23' (Q1/Q16), Xaxa committee and the Vedanta/Dongria Kondh case alongside PESA, FRA, SAMADHAN and UAPA (Q14). -> Build a stock of the exact committee/act/case attached to each GS3 theme and deploy it as evidence; specific institutional references demonstrate you've engaged the syllabus, not just opinions.