View answer copy →Raj Krishna JhaRank 8CSE 2024
Answered a closely related question
Their question: “Localization of global disaster risk reduction frameworks — critical examination (15 marks, 250 words)”
The topper critically examines how global DRR frameworks (Sendai, Hyogo) are localized, supplying the framework knowledge needed for the PYQ on India's DRR measures before/after Sendai and how it differs from Hyogo.
Key learnings from their answer
- ›Solutions are consistently anchored to named frameworks and committees instead of vague suggestions, Sendai, Hyogo and Yokohama frameworks, 2nd ARC recommendations, and the Gadgil & Kasturirangan committees on the Western Ghats. -> Tie every 'way forward' to a specific report or framework by name; it signals you know the actual policy architecture rather than improvising remedies.
- ›Value-addition is built in without padding, a 'RESILIENT' mnemonic to structure the 2nd ARC capacity-building answer (Q6) and a 'glocalization' framing (with CBDR, WHO, adaptation-mitigation) to critically examine localizing global DRR frameworks (Q7). -> One memorable coined term or acronym per high-mark answer gives the examiner a hook to remember your script by; deploy it sparingly on the 15-markers, not everywhere.