Loading...
Loading...
Paper
GS-II
Question
Q4
Marks
15M
Word Limit
150W
Directive: Discuss
Present multiple viewpoints in detail before a balanced conclusion.
Structure (15 marks · about 150 words)
This sub-point (Comparison of the Indian constitutional scheme with other countries) has been asked 7 times since 2013
Write your answer above, then get it evaluated free by the AWE Bot or train daily with the Sherlocking Mains programme.
Paper
GS Paper II: Polity, Governance & International Relations
Subject
Comparison of ConstitutionsSubtopic
Comparison of the Indian constitutional scheme with other countries
Source
Official UPSC 2024 paper (verbatim)
Official UPSC syllabus: Comparison of the Indian constitutional scheme with that of other countries.
Questions frequently practiced alongside this one by UPSC aspirants
“The reform process in the United Nations remains unresolved, because of the delicate imbalance of East and West and entanglement of the USA vs. Russo-Chinese alliance.” Examine and critically evaluate the East-West policy confrontations in this regard.
Energy security constitutes the dominant kingpin of India’s foreign policy, and is linked with India’s overarching influence in Middle Eastern countries.” How would you integrate energy security with India’s foreign policy trajectories in the coming years?
With the waning of globalization, post-Cold War world is becoming a site of sovereign nationalism.” Elucidate.
India-Africa digital partnership is achieving mutual respect, co-development and long-term institutional partnerships. Elaborate.
e-governance projects have a built-in bias towards technology and back-end integration than user-centric designs. Examine.
This is a verbatim UPSC Mains 2024 GS-II question from the "Comparison of Constitutions" area of the official syllabus. It carries 15 marks with a 150-word limit.
For a 15-mark question with a 150-word limit, decode the directive verb first, then structure your answer with a crisp introduction, 2–3 substantiated body points, and a forward-looking conclusion within the limit.