Find the refractive index of the second medium with respect to the first medium, if light moves through the first medium with velocity 2 × 10⁸ ms⁻¹, which changes to 1.25 × 10⁸ ms⁻¹ in the second medium.
- (1)2.5
- (2)1.33
- (3)1.6
- (4)0.625
Correct — option (3), 1.6. The refractive index of a second medium with respect to a first is the ratio of the speed of light in the first medium to the speed of light in the second — the speeds go the opposite way round from the media, which is the single point on which this calculation turns. Writing n₂₁ for the refractive index of medium 2 with respect to medium 1, n₂₁ = v₁ / v₂. Substituting the values printed in the stem, v₁ = 2 × 10⁸ m s⁻¹ and v₂ = 1.25 × 10⁸ m s⁻¹, gives n₂₁ = 2 × 10⁸ ÷ (1.25 × 10⁸). The powers of ten cancel, leaving 2 ÷ 1.25, which is 1.6. Like relative density, refractive index is a ratio of two like quantities and therefore carries no unit. There is a check on the answer that costs nothing and catches most of the ways this question is lost. Light slows down when it enters the second medium — from 2 × 10⁸ to 1.25 × 10⁸ metres per second — which means the second medium is optically denser than the first, and the refractive index of a denser medium with respect to a rarer one must be greater than 1. Any answer below 1 is therefore wrong before it is checked arithmetically. A second and more satisfying cross-check comes from the absolute indices. The absolute refractive index of a medium is the speed of light in vacuum divided by the speed in that medium, so with c taken as 3 × 10⁸ m s⁻¹, the first medium has an absolute index of 3 ÷ 2 = 1.5, which is about the value for ordinary glass, and the second has 3 ÷ 1.25 = 2.4, which is about the value for diamond. The relative index then follows as n₂₁ = n₂ / n₁ = 2.4 ÷ 1.5 = 1.6, the same answer by a different route, and the two media turn out to be a realistic pair rather than arbitrary numbers. So the value asked for is 1.6, which is option (3).
- (1)2.5 — This is the product of the two speeds' coefficients rather than their quotient: 2 multiplied by 1.25 gives 2.5. It is an operation error rather than an arithmetic one, and it is what a candidate produces who remembers that refractive index involves two speeds without remembering how they are combined. The definition is a ratio, and the same relation can be reached from Snell's law, which states that n₁ sin i = n₂ sin r and therefore that the refractive index of the second medium with respect to the first equals sin i divided by sin r — a ratio again, never a product. There is also a quick way to see that 2.5 cannot be right even if the operation is forgotten. A refractive index of 2.5 would make the second medium denser than diamond, whose index is about 2.42, relative to a first medium that is itself denser than vacuum; the physical world offers nothing in that range for a pair of ordinary transparent media, and the numbers in the stem are far too gentle to produce it.
- (2)1.33 — This option is not derivable from the two speeds in the stem at all: no combination of 2 × 10⁸ and 1.25 × 10⁸ produces 1.33. It is there because 1.33 is the most memorised number in this part of the syllabus — the refractive index of water with respect to air, four-thirds — and a candidate who recognises the shape of a refractive-index question before reading its numbers will reach for the value they know. That is a distinct and very common failure: recall substituting for calculation. Whenever a numerical question supplies its own data, the answer must come out of that data, and a familiar constant appearing among the options is a warning rather than a help. The standard values are worth holding — air about 1.0003, water about 1.33, ordinary glass about 1.5, diamond about 2.42 — but they belong to questions that ask for them, and here the stem asks for a relative index between two media whose speeds it has already given.
- (4)0.625 — This is the ratio taken the wrong way round: 1.25 divided by 2 is 0.625. The value is not meaningless — it is the refractive index of the FIRST medium with respect to the second, n₁₂, and the two are reciprocals, so n₂₁ × n₁₂ = 1 and 1.6 × 0.625 is indeed 1. What the option gets wrong is which of the two the question asked for, and the stem is explicit: the refractive index of the second medium with respect to the first. This is the most instructive of the three wrong answers, because it fails on the direction of a comparison rather than on any physics, and directions are what such questions are usually built on. The physical check disposes of it immediately as well. Light slowed down on entering the second medium, so the second medium is optically denser and the index of the second with respect to the first has to exceed 1; a value of 0.625 asserts the opposite of what the stem's own numbers say.
Light travels fastest in vacuum, at about 3 × 10⁸ metres per second, and more slowly in any material medium. The absolute refractive index of a medium is defined as the speed of light in vacuum divided by the speed of light in that medium, so it is always greater than 1 and is larger for media in which light is slower. When light passes from one medium to another it changes direction at the boundary, and the relation governing that bending is Snell's law: n₁ sin i = n₂ sin r, where i is the angle of incidence and r the angle of refraction, both measured from the normal. Rearranged, this gives the refractive index of the second medium with respect to the first as n₂₁ = n₂ / n₁ = sin i / sin r = v₁ / v₂, three equivalent expressions of the same ratio. Light bends towards the normal when it enters a denser medium and away from the normal when it enters a rarer one. That second case has a limit: beyond a certain angle of incidence, called the critical angle and given by sin C = 1 / n, light travelling from a denser medium into a rarer one is not refracted out at all but reflected entirely back, which is total internal reflection. It is what makes optical fibres carry signals, what makes a diamond sparkle — diamond's very high index of about 2.42 gives it a critical angle of only about 24 degrees — and what produces mirages over a hot road. Refractive index also varies slightly with the wavelength of light, which is dispersion, and is why a prism spreads white light into a spectrum and why a rainbow has colours.
MPSC's science section usually carries one or two short optics items, and they are of two sorts: a one-step numerical like this one, and a conceptual question about total internal reflection, dispersion or image formation. The numerical is designed so that the arithmetic is trivial and the marks depend on holding a definition in the right order. That is why the option set here contains the correct quotient, the reciprocal quotient, the product, and a famous constant — four rows that between them cover every way of mishandling one definition. When you meet a question of this shape, write the definition down in symbols before substituting anything, because the direction of a ratio is much easier to get right on paper than in the head under time pressure. Note the printed form as well: the stem uses typeset superscripts for the powers of ten and for the unit ms⁻¹, and both are reproduced here as printed. Reading the exponents carefully matters more than it appears to, since the powers of ten in this particular problem cancel completely and a candidate who mishandles them can manufacture a factor that the physics does not contain.
- The refractive index of a second medium with respect to a first is n₂₁ = v₁ / v₂ — the speed in the first medium divided by the speed in the second — so the speeds appear in the opposite order to the media.
- For the values in this question, 2 × 10⁸ m s⁻¹ divided by 1.25 × 10⁸ m s⁻¹ gives 1.6; the powers of ten cancel and the result, being a ratio of two like quantities, carries no unit.
- The absolute refractive index of a medium is the speed of light in vacuum divided by the speed in that medium; taking c as 3 × 10⁸ m s⁻¹ makes the first medium 1.5, close to ordinary glass, and the second 2.4, close to diamond, and 2.4 ÷ 1.5 again gives 1.6.
- Snell's law states n₁ sin i = n₂ sin r, so the same relative index equals sin i / sin r; n₂₁ and n₁₂ are reciprocals, and their product is 1.
- Light slowing down on entering a medium means that medium is optically denser, and the refractive index of a denser medium with respect to a rarer one is always greater than 1; standard values are about 1.0003 for air, 1.33 for water, 1.5 for glass and 2.42 for diamond.
- Total internal reflection occurs when light travelling from a denser to a rarer medium strikes the boundary beyond the critical angle C, where sin C = 1 / n; it is the principle behind optical fibres and behind the brilliance of a cut diamond.
The option set is built from the four ways one definition can be mishandled: the correct quotient, the reciprocal quotient, the product, and a famous constant borrowed from memory in place of a calculation the stem supplies its own data for. Three equivalent expressions of the same ratio are worth holding together — n₂₁ = n₂ ÷ n₁ = sin i ÷ sin r = v₁ ÷ v₂, the middle one being Snell's law rearranged; n₂₁ and n₁₂ are reciprocals and their product is 1. Standard values to carry: about 1.0003 for air, 1.33 for water, 1.5 for glass, 2.42 for diamond. Beyond the critical angle C, where sin C = 1 ÷ n, light going from a denser to a rarer medium is not refracted out at all but totally internally reflected — the principle behind optical fibres, behind the brilliance of a cut diamond, and behind a mirage over a hot road.
- Inverting the ratio and reporting the refractive index of the first medium with respect to the second, which is the reciprocal of the value asked for
- Multiplying the two speeds instead of dividing them, an operation error that survives arithmetic checking because the multiplication itself is correct
- Substituting a memorised constant such as 1.33 for a calculation the stem has supplied its own data for
- Forgetting that a medium in which light is slower is the denser one, so that a relative index below 1 is accepted where the stem's own numbers forbid it
- Attaching a unit to a refractive index, which like relative density is a ratio of two like quantities and therefore dimensionless
Optics arrives in MPSC papers in three shapes. The first is a one-step numerical of this kind, giving two speeds, two angles or two absolute indices and asking for the relative index; the marks turn on the direction of the ratio rather than on the arithmetic. The second is conceptual, asking which phenomenon explains a mirage, why a diamond sparkles, how an optical fibre carries light, or why the sky is blue — the last belonging to scattering rather than refraction, which is itself a distinction the Commission tests. The third is a definition item asking for the value of a named constant or for what happens to the wavelength and frequency of light when it enters a denser medium, where the frequency is unchanged and the wavelength shortens. Holding one page with the definitions, Snell's law, the critical-angle formula and the four standard refractive indices covers all three.
No directly related past PYQ was found.
- practice — not a real PYQ
When light passes from air into glass, which of the following remains unchanged ?
- (a)Its speed
- (b)Its wavelength
- (c)Its frequency
- (d)Its direction of travel
Answer(c) Its frequency — the frequency of a light wave is set by the source and does not change when the wave crosses into another medium. The speed falls, because glass is optically denser than air, and since the speed is the product of frequency and wavelength, the wavelength must fall in the same proportion. The direction changes as well, the ray bending towards the normal on entering the denser medium, except in the special case of light striking the surface along the normal itself.
- practice — not a real PYQ
If the refractive index of a medium with respect to air is 2, the critical angle for light passing from that medium into air is given by which of the following ?
- (a)sin C = 2, so C is undefined
- (b)sin C = 0.5, so C is 30 degrees
- (c)sin C = 1, so C is 90 degrees
- (d)sin C = 0.25, so C is about 14.5 degrees
Answer(b) sin C = 0.5, so C is 30 degrees — the critical angle is given by sin C = 1 / n, so with n = 2 the sine of the critical angle is one half and the angle is 30 degrees. Beyond that angle of incidence, light travelling from the denser medium towards air is not refracted out at all but is totally internally reflected. The higher the refractive index, the smaller the critical angle, which is why diamond with an index of about 2.42 has a critical angle of only about 24 degrees and traps light so effectively.