1.State Legislative Authority Affirmed by Supreme Court (Separation of Powers)
What & Where
Nandini Sundar vs State of Chhattisgarh (2011): SC stopped use of ill-trained SPOs in Maoist belt of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh Auxiliary Armed Police Forces Act (2016): State law re-authorising auxiliary force akin to Salwa Judum, Koya Commandos
Geography: Salwa Judum operated chiefly in tribal Bastar division, south Chhattisgarh
Quick Facts for MCQs
Legal & Policy
- Authority: State legislatures competent to legislate unless field is constitutionally barred
- Limitation: Judicial review restricted to constitutional validity and legislative competence of statute
- Retrospectivity: Legislatures can pass retrospective or validating Acts without directly overruling judgments
Security Dimension
- Auxiliary force: Mirrors earlier SPO structure for anti-Naxalite operations
- Concern: SPOs criticised for inadequate training, rights violations prompting 2011 restriction
- Tribal recruitment: Koya youths central to both Salwa Judum and new auxiliary formations
Judicial Doctrine
- Separation: Judiciary cannot prevent legislature from lawmaking but can test its constitutionality
- Basis removal: Acceptable legislative tool to neutralise judgment’s legal foundation
- Contempt scope: Non-existent when subsequent law duly alters earlier factual or legal premises
Key Data Points
| Feature | Data-Point |
|---|---|
| Apex verdict year | 2011 |
| Constitution articles cited | 14 (equality), 21 (life & liberty) |
| SC 2011 directive | Cease deployment of SPOs in anti-Maoist duties |
| Contempt plea outcome (2025) | Rejected; state seen as compliant |
| Key doctrine reiterated | Separation of Powers |
| Legislature may | Enact new law, remove basis of judgment, validate struck-down law |
| Similar precedent | Indian Aluminium Co. vs State of Kerala 1996 |
| Security programmes | Salwa Judum (2005), Koya Commandos (tribal SPOs) |
| New state Act status | Valid unless proven unconstitutional or ultra vires |
| Court-accepted compliance proof | Periodic status reports by Chhattisgarh govt |
Related UPSC Prelims PYQs
मेनका गांधी बनाम भारत संघ केस, 1978 के सन्दर्भ में, निम्नलिखित में से कौन-सा कथन सही है?
The Judgment of the Supreme Court in Peoples’ Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India 2004 is related to which of the following ?


