1.Champakam Dorairajan Judgment Significance (Fundamental Rights)
What & Where
Champakam Dorairajan case 1951, first Supreme Court clash between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles
Disputed Madras Communal General Order reserving college seats by caste & religion
Heard in Madras High Court, finally decided by five-judge Supreme Court bench, New Delhi
Quick Facts for MCQs
Legal & Policy
- Judgment allowed Parliament to amend FRs under Article 368
- Education quotas voided until Article 15(4) restoration
- DPSPs remain non-justiciable guidance, cannot automatically curb FRs
Constitutional Amendments
- First Amendment widened Article 19(2) limits, added Articles 31A & 31B
- Ninth Schedule shields land reform laws from FR review
- Articles 85 & 174 capped inter-session gap at six months
Judiciary Precedents
- Golaknath 1967 barred FR curbs, later overruled on scope
- Kesavananda 1973 coined Basic Structure, upheld limited Article 31C shield
- Minerva Mills 1980 struck 42nd Amendment’s DPSP supremacy, restored harmony
Social Justice
- Article 46 obliges state to advance SC, ST, weaker sections
- Public job quotas already valid via Article 16(4)
- President lists SCs & STs statewise under Articles 341 & 342
Key Data Points
| Feature | Data-Point |
|---|---|
| Supreme Court verdict year | 1951 |
| Bench strength | 5 judges |
| Impugned order | Madras Communal GO 1927 |
| Articles held violated | 14, 15(1) |
| Hierarchy established | FRs prevail over DPSPs |
| Triggered amendment | 1st Constitutional Amendment 1951 |
| Clause inserted | Article 15(4) for SEBC, SC, ST quotas |
| Protective device created | Ninth Schedule via Article 31B |
Related UPSC Prelims PYQs
Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, etc. (Article 15 of the Constitution of India) is a Fundamental Right classifiable under
Match List I (Article of Indian Constitution) with List II (Provisions) and select the correct answer using the codes given below the lists:








