1.Three-Year Judicial Practice Requirement (Judiciary Recruitment)

What & Where
Mandate: Supreme Court restores rule demanding minimum three years active legal practice before sitting for State Civil Judge (Junior Division) exams
Applicability: Entry-level judicial posts across all States/UTs; criterion earlier scrapped in 2002
Quick Facts for MCQs
Quality Rationale
- Preparedness: Litigation exposure sharpens decision-making, procedural handling, legal intuition
- Feedback: 23/25 High Courts termed fresh graduates’ performance sub-par
- Global: Comparable systems demand prior practice before bench entry
Equity Concerns
- Inclusion: Women, first-generation lawyers face financial, familial hurdles sustaining unpaid early litigation years
- Workplace: Court corridors rife with harassment, weak mentorship; deters marginalized aspirants
- Diversity: Added filter risks shrinking representation in subordinate judiciary
Institutional Jurisdiction
- Constitution: Article 234 assigns eligibility framing to State executive + High Court consultation
- Debate: Critics label SC condition as possible judicial overreach
- Enforcement: No uniform verification, raising fears of tokenistic compliance
Key Data Points
| Feature | Data-Point |
|---|---|
| Minimum courtroom experience | 3 years |
| Target post | Civil Judge (Junior Division) |
| Key Supreme Court case | All India Judges Association v. Union of India |
| High Courts finding fresh recruits lacking | 23 of 25 |
| Constitutional article on appointments | Article 234 |
| NFHS average female marriage age | 19.2 years |
Related UPSC Prelims PYQs
Consider the following statements:
उच्चतम न्यायालय के न्यायाधीश के रूप में किसे नियुक्त किया जा सकता है?





