1.Bills on Parliamentary Sittings, POCSO Amendment (Parliamentary Sittings Bills)
What & Where
Private Member’s Bills in Rajya Sabha seek fixed parliamentary sittings & victim-centric tweaks to POCSO Act, 2012.
Applies nationwide; hinges on Parliament procedures under Articles 85 (Union) & 174 (States).
POCSO safeguards every child (<18 yrs) in India against sexual offences.
Quick Facts for MCQs
Parliamentary Functioning
- Productivity: lost hours from disruptions to be offset by extended sittings.
- Calendar: echoes 1955 General Purposes Committee & 2002 Constitution Review Panel recommendations.
- Accountability: more sitting days force fuller ministerial answers & debates.
POCSO Amendments
- Provision: 24-hour police/CWC presentation, structured compensation, stakeholder training mandates.
- Scope: makes Act explicitly victim-centric, targeting speedy, sensitive justice.
- Coverage: addresses consensual 16-18 yrs cases causing prolonged detention.
Implementation Gaps
- Capacity: limited Special Courts & trained prosecutors slow trials.
- Reporting: fear, stigma curb timely FIRs despite mandatory disclosure clause.
- Compensation: absence of uniform procedure delays relief to survivors.
Key Data Points
| Feature | Data-Point |
|---|---|
| Proposed annual sittings | Lok Sabha 120 days; Rajya Sabha 100 days |
| Average sittings 1st Lok Sabha | 135 per year (1952-57) |
| Average sittings 17th Lok Sabha | 55 per year (2019-24) |
| Max gap between sessions | ≤ 6 months (Art. 85, 174) |
| NCRB rise in POCSO cases | +94 % since 2017 |
| Pending/registered POCSO cases | > 2 lakh (May 2024) |
| Support-person absence | 96 % cases lack assigned support |
| Mandatory report time in Bill | Child before CWC & court within 24 hours |
| Special Public Prosecutor shortage | Identified as key implementation hurdle |
| POCSO court availability | Not all districts have designated courts |







