1.Ad Hoc High Court Judges (Article 224A)
What & Where
Ad-hoc High Court judges – retired judges re-inducted temporarily under Article 224A of the Constitution
Posted in State High Courts across India to cut pendency, mainly criminal cases
Enjoy identical powers & privileges as sitting judges; not part of regular sanctioned strength
Quick Facts for MCQs
Appointment Process
- Identification: Chief Justice selects retirees, obtains written consent
- Routing: Proposal moves via Union Law Ministry to Supreme Court Collegium
- Approval: President issues warrant on Cabinet advice led by Prime Minister
Service Conditions
- Powers: Full judicial authority of a High Court judge during term
- Benefits: Salary, leave, protocol status equal to permanent peers; pension unchanged
- Exit: Automatic demitting after fixed tenure unless reappointed anew
Purpose & Rationale
- Backlog: Quick infusion of experience to tackle surging criminal case pendency
- Flexibility: Temporary measure without altering sanctioned strength or triggering fresh vacancies
- Efficiency Goal: Supreme Court push for five-year pendency clearance target
Checks & Balances
- Dual Consent: Retired judge’s willingness plus Presidential approval ensure voluntariness and oversight
- Collegium Vetting: Maintains competence and integrity standards
- Time-Bound Nature: Prevents permanent dilution of standard appointment process
Key Data Points
| Feature | Data-Point |
|---|---|
| Constitutional Article | 224A |
| Appointer | President of India |
| Recommending Authority | Chief Justice of High Court |
| Additional Endorsement | Supreme Court Collegium |
| Eligibility | Any consenting retired High Court judge |
| Prior Consents Needed | Judge & President |
| Typical Tenure | 2–3 years |
| Allowances & Privileges | Same as regular High Court judge; rates fixed by President |
| Final Executive Advice | Prime Minister |
| Strength Count | Excluded from regular judge cadre |
Related UPSC Prelims PYQs
उच्चतम न्यायालय के न्यायाधीश के रूप में किसे नियुक्त किया जा सकता है?
With reference to Indian judiciary, consider the following statements:







